Philips 221V8LN 22-inch Gaming Monitor Review: So Much For So Little

VA Panel, 75 Hz, FreeSync and wide gamut color for just $70.

Philips 221V8LN
Editor's Choice
(Image credit: © 3DTested)

Why you can trust 3DTested Our expert reviewers spend hours testing and comparing products and services so you can choose the best for you. Find out more about how we test.

To read about our monitor tests in-depth, please check out Display Testing Explained: How We Test PC Monitors. Brightness and Contrast testing is covered on page two.

Uncalibrated – Maximum Backlight Level

Out of the box, the 221V8LN doesn’t quite hit its 250-nit spec, but at just over 235, it’s close. For any indoor space, this is plenty of light. The magic happens when checking out its very low black levels. They are twice as dark as the next screen, Dell’s S2422HG. That results in a superb contrast ratio of 4277:1, higher than almost every non-OLED panel I’ve tested. This is achieved with no clipping of highlight or shadow detail. Every brightness step is discernable from bottom to top, which is superlative performance.  

After Calibration to 200 nits

The 221V8LN’s contrast increased a bit with calibration. Visually, the difference is tiny, but any gain is worth the effort. Black levels are super low, which makes highlights pop and color look more saturated. Regarding LCD native contrast, it truly doesn’t get much better than this.

The 221V8LN maintains its high contrast in the ANSI test. It’s closer to its static number than almost every monitor I’ve ever tested of any type. This is simply astounding in a $70 monitor.

MORE: Best Gaming Monitors

MORE: How We Test PC Monitors

MORE: How to Buy a PC Monitor

MORE: How to Choose the Best HDR Monitor

Christian Eberle
Contributing Editor
  • citylion
    Personally I have to disagree.

    Nearly all content, movies, blurays, webpages, games, have been mastered to adhere to rec. 709 / srgb standards. I bought a LG ultrawide monitor for its DCIP3 color, and sure its good, but the sRGB mode is absolutely terribly inaccurate, visibly so, with a green tint.
    Reply