AMD's Athlon Stepping Improvements
Features
By
Patrick Schmid
published
Add us as a preferred source on Google
Stay On the Cutting Edge: Get the 3DTested Newsletter
Get 3DTested's best news and in-depth reviews, straight to your inbox.
By submitting your information you agree to the Terms & Conditions and Privacy Policy and are aged 16 or over.
You are now subscribed
Your newsletter sign-up was successful
An account already exists for this email address, please log in.
Subscribe to our newsletter
Synthetic Benchmarks
The memory performance of the 65-nm G steppings seems to be clearly behind the performance seen with the 90-nm Windsor cores. The synthetic benchmarks reveal low-level performance differences, but they usually aren't very relevant in real-life applications. Hence, this difference explains why the 65-nm versions are marginally behind their 90-nm siblings when it comes to computing performance.
Stay On the Cutting Edge: Get the 3DTested Newsletter
Get 3DTested's best news and in-depth reviews, straight to your inbox.
Current page: Synthetic Benchmarks
Prev Page Application Benchmarks Next Page Windows Vista Performance Index
Editor-in-Chief (2005-2006)
No comments yet
Comment from the forums