Results
Swipe to scroll horizontally
| Row 0 - Cell 0 | NextHardware | Hiwa-Zilla-Qballe | Extreme Hardware | Memory Extreme |
| PiFast | 17.24 | 17.25 | 17.07 | 16.86 |
| SuperPI 1M | 8.034 | 7.816 | 7.769 | 7.768 |
| SuperPI 32M | 10:17:854 | Row 3 - Cell 2 | Row 3 - Cell 3 | 11:19:142 |
| Wprime 32M | 12.870 | 12.886 | 12.760 | |
| Wprime 1024M | 430.154 | 420.342 | Row 5 - Cell 3 | 419.749 |
| AquaMark | Row 6 - Cell 1 | 194,175 | Row 6 - Cell 3 | 211,925 |
| 3DMark01 | Row 7 - Cell 1 | Row 7 - Cell 2 | Row 7 - Cell 3 | 78938 |
| 3DMark03 | Row 8 - Cell 1 | Row 8 - Cell 2 | Row 8 - Cell 3 | 69399 |
| 3DMark05 | Row 9 - Cell 1 | 28879 | Row 9 - Cell 3 | 30602 |
| 3DMark06 | Row 10 - Cell 1 | 19750 | Row 10 - Cell 3 | 21249 |
Team Memory Extreme, after the first day’s difficulties and those encountered on the morning of the second day, changed strategy. Following all the benchmarks to mark a score, they then improved all the results one by one. It seems that the strategy was successful—Memory Extreme reached the first position in 9 out of 10 specialties, followed by Team Hiwa-Zilla-Qballe. It was third place for NextHardware, while closing the ranks was Extreme Hardware, due to two burned motherboards putting them out of the challenge.
TOPICS
