ViewSonic XG2536 25-inch FHD IPS 280 Hz gaming monitor review: Incredibly quick and value priced

The ViewSonic XG2536 is a 25-inch FHD IPS gaming monitor with 280 Hz, Adaptive-Sync and HDR10.

Reviews
By published
ViewSonic XG2536
Editor's Choice
(Image credit: © 3DTested)

Why you can trust 3DTested Our expert reviewers spend hours testing and comparing products and services so you can choose the best for you. Find out more about how we test.

Our HDR benchmarking uses Portrait Displays’ Calman software. To learn about our HDR testing, see our breakdown of how we test PC monitors.

The XG2536 supports HDR10 signals with a seamless switch when the OSD option is set to Auto, which it is by default. There’s no dynamic dimming available but the HDR image is very bright and color accurate.

HDR Brightness and Contrast

Image 1 of 3
ViewSonic XG2536
(Image credit: 3DTested)

The XG2536’s peak brightness is on par with the competition, but black levels and contrast are not. There’s no zone or field dimming so there is no increase in dynamic range. The other displays either use VA tech with its higher native contrast, or modulate the backlight to increase the difference between dark and light. The XG2536 looks good on its own, but a little less impactful when compared to the others side-by-side.

Grayscale, EOTF and Color

Image 1 of 3
ViewSonic XG2536
(Image credit: Portrait Displays Calman)

The XG2536 nailed my HDR color tests. Grayscale tracking is free of visible errors with all values below 3dE. That’s better than the majority of HDR monitors I’ve tested. It also sticks close to the EOTF reference except for the darkest shades which are too light. Shadow detail is very clear but closer to dark gray than black. This reduces impact a bit but in brighter content, highlights pop nicely.

In the gamut tests, the XG2536 hits every point on target until running out of color. For DCI-P3, it tops out at 82% red and 75% green, but fully covers blue. Magenta is a tad off hue as well. In the BT.2020 test, it hits the inner targets accurately but only makes it to 70% red, 55% green and 95% blue. This is typical performance for an sRGB HDR monitor.

Test Takeaway: The XG2536’s has very accurate HDR color that only falls short in volume thanks to an sRGB gamut. Grayscale and EOTF tracking are exemplary except for the darkest shades which are a tad light. None of these obscures fine detail and texture though. The picture is accurate and vibrant but just a little less colorful than the competition. The addition of field dimming would make a nice improvement.

MORE: Best Gaming Monitors

MORE: How We Test PC Monitors

MORE: How to Buy a PC Monitor

Christian Eberle
Christian Eberle
Contributing Editor
1 Comment Comment from the forums
  • cyrusfox
    Impressive cost per Hz, and super input lag.
    Https://cdn.mos.cms.futurecdn.net/bd4a2pJ8tuxzFTUNUKBkfQ-1200-80.png.webpHow does you input lag testing compare to this one at RTINGS.comGuessing very different methodology as your values appear to be a bit longer/slower than what I would expect compared to what I see at their website. Would be interested if you could explain how you are performing the input lag test.

    Thanks for the thorough review!

    It appears the longer I hold out on my next monitor the better the choices continue to be. I was just at Costco and they had the MSI 170Hz 1440p for $150, was only 2 left, was tempted but no time for that past time at the moment. That one shows inputlag at RTING of this MSI monitor
    Native Resolution @ Max Hz(170) 3.5 ms
    Native Resolution @ 120Hz 4.7 ms
    Native Resolution @ 60Hz 8.8 ms
    Backlight Strobing (BFI) 6.9 ms
    I got rid of my 165/180hz 1440 when I moved in December(LG G 27GP850-B), back to my old monitors I had in storage, an old 2018 4k 60hz IPS LG and widescreen 1440p 75hz VA (ick) Samsung panel right now, for work they are better than the laptop screen, haven't even got my desktop rig powered up yet.
    Reply