Asus ROG Swift PG32UCDM3 240 Hz QD-OLED gaming monitor review: Asus delivers a true flagship OLED

32-inch Quantum Dot OLED with 4K resolution, 240 Hz, Adaptive-Sync, HDR10, Dolby Vision, BlackShield Film, DisplayHDR 500, and wide gamut color

Asus ROG Swift PG32UCDM3
Editor's Choice
(Image credit: © 3DTested)

Why you can trust 3DTested Our expert reviewers spend hours testing and comparing products and services so you can choose the best for you. Find out more about how we test.

For users needing a great all-around display, the 32-inch 16:9 flat OLED is about as good as it gets. This category is still firmly priced at the premium level, but it also reinforces the axiom, “you never regret buying the best.” The Asus ROG Swift PG32UCDM3 embodies that principle.

Asus ROG Swift PG32UCDM3

(Image credit: Asus)

Gamers will love its stunning image and next-level performance. When comparing OLED monitors, there is no real difference in feel or smoothness at speeds over 200fps. While a 330 or 500 Hz OLED is cool, it won’t do much for gaming besides drop input lag by a few milliseconds. And the PG32UCDM3 managed 18ms in my test, making it one of the quickest 4K screens I’ve reviewed. And if you spring for one in hopes of upgrading your PC after the fact, it has ELMB for smooth operation at 120 Hz.

(Image credit: 3DTested)

Image-wise, it has no competition outside the OLED genre. It’s colorful, accurate and bright with incredible depth and contrast. HDR looks amazing and the PG32UCDM3 is one of only a handful of monitors to support Dolby Vision. It also looks to the future with DisplayPort 2.1a and HDMI 2.1. Want to hook up peripherals? It has actual USB ports too, something that has been disappearing from screens of late.

If you have $1,299 to spend on a high-end gaming monitor, and you need it to do work too, the Asus ROG Swift PG32UCDM3 is a stellar choice. You will not regret buying the best in this case. If you have the opportunity, definitely check it out.

MORE: Best Gaming Monitors

MORE: How We Test PC Monitors

MORE: How to Buy a PC Monitor

Christian Eberle
Contributing Editor
  • COLGeek
    Must be an okay device when the only con is a lack of speakers (which no serious user would rely upon).

    Rather pricey from the one (Asus) site I saw it listed. That will be the more significant con for many.
    Reply
  • truerock
    I hate internal speakers!

    Huge plus: no internal speakers
    Reply
  • Rand0m_Guy
    The Asus XG32UCWMG has a better image and I notice its nowhere in your reviews or comparisons. Unfortunately for the WOLED variant, they only put a DP1.4 on it, not the DP2.1 they have on the QD-OLED 🙁

    And Contrast is measurable on a QD-OLED. The proof, put a WOLED and a QD-OLED next to each other in a dark room with a black screen, the QD-OLED screens glow, WOLED doesn't!
    Reply
  • NayWard
    So expensive if you use a multi monitor set up you'll pay more than you would for a decent second hand car. Or 3 months rent. AUD

    And of course... It's out of stock.
    Reply