Asus ROG Swift PG32UCDM3 240 Hz QD-OLED gaming monitor review: Asus delivers a true flagship OLED

32-inch Quantum Dot OLED with 4K resolution, 240 Hz, Adaptive-Sync, HDR10, Dolby Vision, BlackShield Film, DisplayHDR 500, and wide gamut color

Asus ROG Swift PG32UCDM3
Editor's Choice
(Image credit: © 3DTested)

Why you can trust 3DTested Our expert reviewers spend hours testing and comparing products and services so you can choose the best for you. Find out more about how we test.

Our HDR benchmarking uses Portrait Displays’ Calman software. To learn about our HDR testing, see our breakdown of how we test PC monitors.

The PG32UCDM3 is one of the only gaming monitors that supports Dolby Vision with three dedicated picture modes. It also supports HDR10 with an automatic switch and four specific modes, which can be adjusted if you like.

HDR Brightness and Contrast

The peak white level is about the same for all the HDR10 modes, just over 504 nits. This is expected given its VESA DisplayHDR 500 certification. I measured a 25% window pattern to get that result. Smaller areas of the screen will probably hit 800-1,000 nits. The top three monitors push a little harder, but in practice, the difference is almost invisible. The PG32UCDM3 is very bright and dynamic with HDR content. I was unable to test Dolby Vision here, but I did view some content from a disc player, which you can read about earlier in this review on page one. Black levels and contrast cannot be measured, so on that score, all the screens are equal.

Grayscale, EOTF and Color

The PG32UCDM3 completely aced my HDR color tests. Grayscale is visually flawless with no errors over 3dE. The EOTF tracks almost perfectly with the reference, with slight darkness below 30%, but not enough to obscure shadow detail. Every step is fully rendered and visible. The tone map transition is at 70%, which is correct for the measured black and white levels. This is in the default HDR10 mode, Gaming HDR. I did not turn on Adjustable HDR because it would skew the luminance tracking without making the monitor brighter. It should only be used for personal preference since it is not technically accurate.

In the gamut tests, the PG32UCDM3 shows a linear and general oversaturation like other Quantum Dot OLEDs. Red and blue are a little more vibrant, while green is on point. There are no significant hue errors in the secondary colors. In the BT.2020 test, the PG32UCDM3 runs out of color at 90% red, 75% green, and 95% blue.

Test Takeaway: The PG32UCDM3 is an exemplary HDR monitor with high brightness and accurate color. Since it nails the EOTF test, it can be relied on to show every bit of fine detail at every point in the brightness range from the blackest black to the whitest white. It reminds one why OLEDs are the best display tech for HDR.

MORE: Best Gaming Monitors

MORE: How We Test PC Monitors

MORE: How to Buy a PC Monitor

Christian Eberle
Contributing Editor
  • COLGeek
    Must be an okay device when the only con is a lack of speakers (which no serious user would rely upon).

    Rather pricey from the one (Asus) site I saw it listed. That will be the more significant con for many.
    Reply
  • truerock
    I hate internal speakers!

    Huge plus: no internal speakers
    Reply
  • Rand0m_Guy
    The Asus XG32UCWMG has a better image and I notice its nowhere in your reviews or comparisons. Unfortunately for the WOLED variant, they only put a DP1.4 on it, not the DP2.1 they have on the QD-OLED 🙁

    And Contrast is measurable on a QD-OLED. The proof, put a WOLED and a QD-OLED next to each other in a dark room with a black screen, the QD-OLED screens glow, WOLED doesn't!
    Reply
  • NayWard
    So expensive if you use a multi monitor set up you'll pay more than you would for a decent second hand car. Or 3 months rent. AUD

    And of course... It's out of stock.
    Reply