Asus ROG Swift PG32UCDM3 240 Hz QD-OLED gaming monitor review: Asus delivers a true flagship OLED

32-inch Quantum Dot OLED with 4K resolution, 240 Hz, Adaptive-Sync, HDR10, Dolby Vision, BlackShield Film, DisplayHDR 500, and wide gamut color

Asus ROG Swift PG32UCDM3
Editor's Choice
(Image credit: © 3DTested)

Why you can trust 3DTested Our expert reviewers spend hours testing and comparing products and services so you can choose the best for you. Find out more about how we test.

To read about our monitor tests in-depth, please check out Display Testing Explained: How We Test PC Monitors. We cover brightness and contrast testing on page two.

Uncalibrated – Maximum Backlight Level

The PG32UCDM3 includes the option of variable or uniform brightness. Typically, the former is where you’ll see the highest peaks if you measure a 25% window pattern as I did. That delivered just over 500 nits in my test, making it the brightest monitor in the group for SDR content. In practice, you don’t need more than 250 nits for an indoor environment. With Uniform Brightness turned on, the PG32UCDM3 measured just over 300 nits peak brightness for a full-field white pattern. Black levels and contrast could not be measured. Though the BlackShield film improves perceived black levels, the effect cannot be measured by a contact luminance meter like the i1 Display.

After Calibration to 200 nits

Calibration has no effect on black levels, static contrast or ANSI contrast, they are still unmeasurable. To equalize the white level, I set Uniform Brightness on with a field pattern and Uniform Brightness off with a 25% window. The PG32UCDM3 remembers the two settings, so once you get it to your liking so you don’t have to revisit the brightness slider every time.

Test Takeaway: The PG32UCDM3 offers typical OLED contrast and image depth. It looks a little blacker to the eye but the effect of the BlackShield tech could not be measured by my instruments. In SDR mode, it’s a little brighter than its competitors with just over 500 nits peak. It also stands out with a uniform vs variable brightness option. Many OLEDs don’t offer this. Bottom line, it’s gorgeous with a picture befitting a premium display.

MORE: Best Gaming Monitors

MORE: How We Test PC Monitors

MORE: How to Buy a PC Monitor

Christian Eberle
Contributing Editor
  • COLGeek
    Must be an okay device when the only con is a lack of speakers (which no serious user would rely upon).

    Rather pricey from the one (Asus) site I saw it listed. That will be the more significant con for many.
    Reply
  • truerock
    I hate internal speakers!

    Huge plus: no internal speakers
    Reply
  • Rand0m_Guy
    The Asus XG32UCWMG has a better image and I notice its nowhere in your reviews or comparisons. Unfortunately for the WOLED variant, they only put a DP1.4 on it, not the DP2.1 they have on the QD-OLED 🙁

    And Contrast is measurable on a QD-OLED. The proof, put a WOLED and a QD-OLED next to each other in a dark room with a black screen, the QD-OLED screens glow, WOLED doesn't!
    Reply
  • NayWard
    So expensive if you use a multi monitor set up you'll pay more than you would for a decent second hand car. Or 3 months rent. AUD

    And of course... It's out of stock.
    Reply