Why you can trust 3DTested
Our HDR benchmarking uses Portrait Displays’ Calman software. To learn about our HDR testing, see our breakdown of how we test PC monitors.
The PG27AQWP-W switches automatically to HDR mode when HDR10 content is present. You get four specific picture modes plus a switch to turn on luminance adjustments. As it turns out, you’ll need this switch to hit maximum brightness.
HDR Brightness and Contrast



By default, the PG27AQWP-W peaks at around 550 nits in HDR mode when measuring a 25% window pattern. To get the 651 nits I recorded, you must turn on Adjustable HDR and set Brightness to 100%. You can do this in any of the four modes. I used Gaming for these tests. Asus claims 1,500 nits for a 1% window and these results give me no reason to doubt it. Black levels and contrast cannot be measured.
Grayscale, EOTF and Color



Adjustable HDR only activates luminance controls, the Color menu remains grayed out so there is no calibration possible. But my sample looked great with just a slight warmth visible at 55% and brighter. This did not impact content in any meaningful way. The EOTF trace is almost exactly the same as the reference, with only a slight darkness below 35% and a slight increase in brightness from 50% to the tone map transition at 70%.
In the color test, the PG27AQWP-W uses its wide gamut advantageously with extra saturation across the board. The points run linearly, so there is no loss of detail at any point in the range. This is the best way to manage large gamuts because you get the extra saturation without blowing out the image with cartoonish color. In the BT.2020 test, the PG27AQWP-W tracks the inner saturations until running out of color at 90% red, 80% green and 95% blue. This is excellent performance.
Test Takeaway: The PG27AQWP-W renders a bright and colorful HDR image. It follows the standard closely in the Gaming HDR mode with correct grayscale, EOTF and gamut tracking. I noted that to get maximum brightness, I had to engage Adjustable HDR which is turned off by default. That took it to a class-leading 651 nits, a figure bested only by one other monitor in the comparison.
MORE: Best Gaming Monitors
Get 3DTested's best news and in-depth reviews, straight to your inbox.
MORE: How We Test PC Monitors
MORE: How to Buy a PC Monitor

-
Distortion67 I'm confused Asus' website clearly states this monitor is a Tandem WOLED but the article states QD-OLED?Reply
Https://shop.asus.com/us/90lm0cf2-b019b2-rog-swift-oled-pg27aqwp-w.html -
marcgii Reply
I dusted off my 9 year old account to comment about this. You're correct. This monitor uses LG's new tandem OLED panel instead of Samsung's QD-OLED panel. All the other reviews identify it correctly.Distortion67 said:I'm confused Asus' website clearly states this monitor is a Tandem WOLED but the article states QD-OLED?
Https://shop.asus.com/us/90lm0cf2-b019b2-rog-swift-oled-pg27aqwp-w.html
This is a pretty big error and I'm surprised they haven't corrected it yet. -
Distortion67 Yeah everything else I've seen definitely calls this a Tandem WOLED.... Just to make sure I think they should send me the review model so I can verify it.Reply -
lizardpeter I'm sorry, but there must be something either majorly wrong with your unit or majorly wrong with your testing. There is not a chance in hell that the monitor has anywhere near 22 ms of "input lag." That would be almost 11 frames. Hardware Unboxed and TFTCentral have already tested this display and found it to have the lowest or tied with the lowest input lag they have ever seen. I would say it was your testing method compared to theirs, but you have a different 480 Hz OLED monitor scoring 10 ms on the same test. There is no possible way that ASUS's flagship 540 Hz OLED tested by other reviewers and found to have the lowest latency ever recorded is 12 ms slower (multiple frames) than an inferior 480 Hz OLED from LG.Reply