Why you can trust 3DTested
The PG27AQWP-W ships in its Racing picture mode, which is close to the mark for grayscale, gamma, and color accuracy. Further adjustments are available in the Color menu, which has color temps, gamma presets, and a gamut selector.
Grayscale and Gamma Tracking
Our grayscale and gamma tests use Calman calibration software from Portrait Displays. We describe our grayscale and gamma tests in detail here.



My PG27AQWP-W sample didn’t quite get under the invisible error threshold of 3dE. I could see a bit of red in the brighter steps of a grayscale pattern. Red is a forgivable error because it’s less visible in content than blue or green. Gamma tracks almost perfectly, which is a very good thing.
Calibration reduces all values to less than 2dE, which is professional grade. Gamma remains right on the reference line with just tiny variations. This is excellent performance.
The sRGB chart shows an uncalibrated screen. I only changed the color space option in Racing mode. I recommend this approach rather than the sRGB Cal mode, which is accurate but non-adjustable. Grayscale runs a tad warm, but similar RGB slider tweaks can remove that error. Gamma just shows a small dip (too bright) at the 90% brightness step.
Comparisons




Many OLEDs can be used straight out of the box without calibration, but some, like the PG27AQWP-,W need a little help to look their best. With the changes in place, the error drops to 0.97 dE, which is well below the visible threshold.
Gamma tracking is spot-on in any case, with a small 0.11 range of values and a 0.91% deviation from the standard. The actual value is 2.18.
Get 3DTested's best news and in-depth reviews, straight to your inbox.
Color Gamut Accuracy
Our color gamut and volume testing use Portrait Displays’ Calman software. For details on our color gamut testing and volume calculations, click here.



The PG27AQWP-W’s DCI-P3 gamut tracking is nearly perfect out of the box, with just minor hue errors in magenta and blue. Saturation is a tad over the mark, which is appropriate for a Quantum Dot monitor like this one. Calibration barely changes the result but now, the hue errors are smaller. The sRGB result is also on the money and good enough to qualify for color-critical tasks. You can easily add the PG27AQWP-W to a video or photo editing suite.
Comparisons


It’s hard to imagine a 1.98dE color error only being good enough for last place, but on planet OLED, this is a typical result. OLEDs as a category are more consistently accurate than LCDs, based on my tests and observations. This is excellent performance.
In the volume test, the PG27AQWP-W ranks among the best at 108.58% DCI-P3 coverage. It is one of the most colorful screens I’ve reviewed. The sRGB gamut covers 95.19%, which is a little short of the mark. Though it isn’t a deal-breaker, my test showed just a slight undersaturation in blue and green.
Test Takeaway: The PG27AQWP-W has superb color with decent out-of-box accuracy and pro-level results after calibration. Gamma is almost perfect in any case, and color volume is among the highest I’ve recorded. It also has a completely qualified sRGB mode if you need to edit photos or SDR videos. The picture quality here is among the best OLED has to offer.
MORE: Best Gaming Monitors
MORE: How We Test PC Monitors
MORE: How to Buy a PC Monitor
Current page: Grayscale, Gamma and Color
Prev Page Brightness and Contrast Next Page HDR Performance
-
Distortion67 I'm confused Asus' website clearly states this monitor is a Tandem WOLED but the article states QD-OLED?Reply
Https://shop.asus.com/us/90lm0cf2-b019b2-rog-swift-oled-pg27aqwp-w.html -
marcgii Reply
I dusted off my 9 year old account to comment about this. You're correct. This monitor uses LG's new tandem OLED panel instead of Samsung's QD-OLED panel. All the other reviews identify it correctly.Distortion67 said:I'm confused Asus' website clearly states this monitor is a Tandem WOLED but the article states QD-OLED?
Https://shop.asus.com/us/90lm0cf2-b019b2-rog-swift-oled-pg27aqwp-w.html
This is a pretty big error and I'm surprised they haven't corrected it yet. -
Distortion67 Yeah everything else I've seen definitely calls this a Tandem WOLED.... Just to make sure I think they should send me the review model so I can verify it.Reply -
lizardpeter I'm sorry, but there must be something either majorly wrong with your unit or majorly wrong with your testing. There is not a chance in hell that the monitor has anywhere near 22 ms of "input lag." That would be almost 11 frames. Hardware Unboxed and TFTCentral have already tested this display and found it to have the lowest or tied with the lowest input lag they have ever seen. I would say it was your testing method compared to theirs, but you have a different 480 Hz OLED monitor scoring 10 ms on the same test. There is no possible way that ASUS's flagship 540 Hz OLED tested by other reviewers and found to have the lowest latency ever recorded is 12 ms slower (multiple frames) than an inferior 480 Hz OLED from LG.Reply