Why you can trust 3DTested
With the market’s current focus on super-fast refresh rates, I had to go back in time a bit to find OLEDs running slower than 300 Hz. At 280 Hz is the XG27AQWMG and Alienware’s AW2725D. At 240 Hz are AOC’s Q27G4ZD and AG276QZD2, Aorus’ FO27Q2, and ViewSonic’s XG272-2K.
Pixel Response and Input Lag
Click here to read up on our pixel response and input lag testing procedures.


The XG27AQWMG’s extra 40 Hz makes no difference in the response test. All the panels draw a full white field in 4ms. In practice, there is no difference in motion resolution, it’s visually perfect across the board.
In the input lag test, the XG27AQWMG sits right in the middle with a 20ms total score. That’s very quick and only 3ms behind the Alienware. The Aorus smokes the competition, using only 240 Hz to do so, with a 13ms score. It doesn’t get much quicker than that. In practice though, you won’t perceive a difference between any of these panels, they’re all incredibly fast and perfectly smooth.
Test Takeaway: OLED technology truly levels the playing field with its flawless motion resolution, which the XG27AQWMG exploits completely. It also has very low input lag with just 20ms total in my test. It stands out from the others by including ELMB, which means smoother motion at frame rates below 140. But when running at full tilt, any OLED faster than 240 Hz will give you the same excellent gaming feel and experience. It truly doesn’t get better than this.
Viewing Angles
The XG27AQWMG has superb off-axis image quality, but it is not perfect. Like nearly all the QD-OLEDs I’ve photographed, there is a slight color shift at 45 degrees to the sides. Here, it’s just a tad red/green. It’s easier to see in a grayscale step pattern than in actual content. There is no change in brightness or gamma, which is a good thing. The top view has reduced gamma and a more pronounced color shift. This is typical QD-OLED performance.
Screen Uniformity
To learn how we measure screen uniformity, click here.
Get 3DTested's best news and in-depth reviews, straight to your inbox.
In my experience, OLED displays have distinctly better screen uniformity than LCDs. It could be the tech, or it could be their premium status, but the numbers cannot be denied. The XG27AQWMG came in at just 2.16% deviation from the center zone. That is well below the visual threshold. It is a strong indicator of the category’s strength when the ViewSonic comes last at 5.93%. This is excellent performance.
MORE: Best Gaming Monitors
MORE: How We Test PC Monitors
MORE: How to Buy a PC Monitor
Current page: Response, Input Lag, Viewing Angles and Uniformity
Prev Page Features and Specifications Next Page Brightness and Contrast
-
user27943284 Reply
The ASUS ROG Strix XG27AQWMG uses a Tandem OLED panel, not a QD-OLED. The Best Buy link provided in the review is for a completely different QD-OLED monitor (XG27ACDMS); the XG27AQWMG hasn’t actually been released in the United States yet.Admin said:Asus brings premium OLED imagery and performance to a lower price point with the ROG Strix XG27AQWMG. It’s a 27-inch QD-OLED with 280 Hz, Adaptive-Sync, HDR500 and wide gamut color.
Asus ROG Strix XG27AQWMG 27-inch 280 Hz OLED gaming monitor review: Premium piece and performance at a lower price point: Read more -
Sp1r0s Looks nice. If only there was a 16:10 option. (This will be my reply to all 16:9 monitor reviews from now on)Reply -
Emberdevilegg This a link to AQDMS…i bought and cancelled when i looked at specs… horrible…I can’t trust this site if your spitting out misinformation, the US Release for AQWMG has not been announced.Reply