Suspicious DJI clones appear on the market after the FCC banned foreign-made drones — Xtra and Skyrover drones look awfully familiar
Are these companies just DJI wearing different colors?
Get 3DTested's best news and in-depth reviews, straight to your inbox.
You are now subscribed
Your newsletter sign-up was successful
The FCC banned all new foreign-made drones from being registered in the U.S. In late 2025, dealing a major blow to Chinese manufacturers like DJI. The company would still be able to sell already existing models, especially as the Department of Commerce didn’t push through with its planned crackdown on Chinese drone imports. However, these companies have essentially no future in the U.S. Because they cannot register new drone models. But just a few weeks after the FCC announcement, the South China Morning Post has already seen several drone and camera models from 'American companies' that look awfully close to DJI’s designs.
Xtra mostly offers action cameras, and its About Us page says that it is “a dynamic and independent start-up company registered in Delaware (DE), United States.” According to SCMP, the company was registered in March 2025, so it’s been operating for less than a year. It’s currently offering four different drone models — the SPHRA360, Muse, Edge Pro, and Edge. Aside from looking identical to the Osmo 360, Osmo Pocket 3, Osmo Action 5 Pro, and Osmo Action 4, respectively, they also have almost the same specifications.
We also checked out the Skyrover S1 and X1, which offer the same profile as the Mini 2 SE and the Mini 4 Pro. Unfortunately, Skyrover does not publish the specifications of its drones, so we cannot compare specs with DJI’s entry-level offerings. Nevertheless, Skyrover lists its business address as Hong Kong, so it’s still covered by the FCC ban and won’t be able to introduce new models like DJI, unless it builds them in the U.S.
Neither DJI nor the two other companies have released a statement regarding the similarity of their product lines at the time of writing, so we cannot confirm how they are related. Still, it makes sense for DJI to diversify its business now that Washington has effectively limited the brand’s future drone business in the U.S., but its only confirmed move so far is its purchase of 3D printer manufacturer Elegoo. It should also be noted that the FCC ban only affects the certification of new drones, so DJI can continue importing, selling, and introducing new Osmo action camera models.
Follow 3DTested on Google News, or add us as a preferred source, to get our latest news, analysis, & reviews in your feeds.
Get 3DTested's best news and in-depth reviews, straight to your inbox.

-
USAFRet This is not new:Reply
https://dronexl.co/2025/10/09/skyany-x1-dji-mini-4-pro-clone-drone-amazon/ -
kameljoe23 Reply
I was nearly sure I read an article a long time ago about the shell companies.USAFRet said:This is not new:
https://dronexl.co/2025/10/09/skyany-x1-dji-mini-4-pro-clone-drone-amazon/
Since some lobbyist s have pushed for this band so that they could potentially sell their own products DJI knew it was inevitable and opened these shell company so that they could build and sell drones within the United States. I'm sorry but the United States and those who are in power are incompetent to realize that the rest of the world uses products from China and they don't have a problem with it yet for some reason we have a problem with it. I don't use drone yet a lot of people do as well as government agencies. -
USAFRet Reply
Lets not delve too far into the political.kameljoe23 said:I was nearly sure I read an article a long time ago about the shell companies.
Since some lobbyist s have pushed for this band so that they could potentially sell their own products DJI knew it was inevitable and opened these shell company so that they could build and sell drones within the United States. I'm sorry but the United States and those who are in power are incompetent to realize that the rest of the world uses products from China and they don't have a problem with it yet for some reason we have a problem with it. I don't use drone yet a lot of people do as well as government agencies.
But I also fly little quadrotors. In my case, a HolyStone instead of DJI. -
weeeezard Replykameljoe23 said:I was nearly sure I read an article a long time ago about the shell companies.
Since some lobbyist s have pushed for this band so that they could potentially sell their own products DJI knew it was inevitable and opened these shell company so that they could build and sell drones within the United States. I'm sorry but the United States and those who are in power are incompetent to realize that the rest of the world uses products from China and they don't have a problem with it yet for some reason we have a problem with it. I don't use drone yet a lot of people do as well as government agencies.
While part of me agrees with you—and I sometimes feel as if our personal info and activities are being argued over in terms of who gets to spy on us first (flock cameras, fusion centers, etc.) As citizens—I also agree that a lot of people making rules for “the people” stand to make handsome financial gains.Kameljoe23 said:I was nearly sure I read an article a long time ago about the shell companies.
Since some lobbyist s have pushed for this band so that they could potentially sell their own products DJI knew it was inevitable and opened these shell company so that they could build and sell drones within the United States. I'm sorry but the United States and those who are in power are incompetent to realize that the rest of the world uses products from China and they don't have a problem with it yet for some reason we have a problem with it. I don't use drone yet a lot of people do as well as government agencies.
Part of me also feels your whole thought process is glazing over details that might make this legislation legitimate. Most other countries aren’t as big of an espionage target, both industrially and in terms of national security. I mean, let’s not forget they flew balloons over the country to surveil our facilities. Remember: little pieces can be aggregated, and information can be weaponized.
However, as I said earlier, it feels odd that politicians would be rabidly pushing so hard on this one issue when there are equivalent real-world shortcomings that need to be addresse
While part of me agrees with you—and I sometimes feel as if our personal info and activities are being argued over in terms of who gets to spy on us first (flock cameras, fusion centers, etc.) As citizens—I also agree that a lot of people making rules for “the people” stand to make handsome financial gains.kameljoe23 said:I was nearly sure I read an article a long time ago about the shell companies.
Since some lobbyist s have pushed for this band so that they could potentially sell their own products DJI knew it was inevitable and opened these shell company so that they could build and sell drones within the United States. I'm sorry but the United States and those who are in power are incompetent to realize that the rest of the world uses products from China and they don't have a problem with it yet for some reason we have a problem with it. I don't use drone yet a lot of people do as well as government agencies.
Part of me also feels your whole thought process is glazing over details that might make this legislation legitimate. Most other countries aren’t as big of an espionage target, both industrially and in terms of national security. I mean, let’s not forget they flew balloons over the country to surveil our facilities. Remember: little pieces can be aggregated, and information can be weaponized.
However, as I said earlier, it feels odd that politicians would be rabidly pushing so hard on this one issue when there are equivalent real-world shortcomings that need to be addressed. I do own and fly 5 DJI drones by the way.Kameljoe23 said: