Nvidia gives Intel a lifeline with $5 billion common stock deal — September deal gets FTC approval for more than 217.4 million Intel shares at $23.28 per share
A new chapter for the industry.
Get 3DTested's best news and in-depth reviews, straight to your inbox.
You are now subscribed
Your newsletter sign-up was successful
Back in September, Nvidia announced a historic equity investment into Intel worth $5 billion, joining the U.S. Government in lending a lifeline to the floundering American chipmaker. Today, Intel has officially sold 214.7 million shares to Nvidia at $23.28 per share, reports Reuters. At the time of the original announcement, that number was 6% above market price, but it's now 36% below what Intel is currently trading at.
The purchase was cleared by the FTC in early December, so it was only a matter of time before we received this news. Intel is worth $172.67 billion at the time of writing, a drastic recovery from 2024 and much of 2025, where it had been valued as low as $82.71 billion.
Over the years, Intel's massive capex spending had put a strain on its financials, which was paired with growing national security concerns over CEO Lip-Bu Tan's former ties to China. Just a few months ago, this commotion had transpired into a dire situation where President Trump was seeking to oust CEO Lip-Bu Tan, but the two eventually reconciled, leading to Washington purchasing an $8.9 billion stake in Intel.
Shortly after these two announcements, Intel and Nvidia unveiled the Intel x86 RTX SoCs, but these weren't a product of the Trump administration's involvement. Rather, this unlikely partnership had been in the works for some time, and was allegedly already in the works before any U.S. Investment was made.
There's no release window for the upcoming RTX SoCs, and it'll take some time before any fruit is borne from the new partnership. But, it's safe to say they whenever they land, it could mark a significant shift in the industry, especially with a revitalized Intel at the helm. The chipmaker's foundry business has also started to find new life, with potential to challenge TSMC's U.S operations, thanks to its early adoption of High-NA EUV lithography.
Follow 3DTested on Google News, or add us as a preferred source, to get our latest news, analysis, & reviews in your feeds.
Get 3DTested's best news and in-depth reviews, straight to your inbox.

-
hotaru251 tin foil hat possibility: now they have incentive for their product to work better w/ intel.Reply -
-Fran- Reply
That is not a "tinfoil hat" thing, but mere economics. Or as others call it: "conflict of interests against free market".hotaru251 said:tin foil hat possibility: now they have incentive for their product to work better w/ intel.
Line must go up!
Rgards. -
TerryLaze Reply
That's a very weird way of putting it since the gov extorted those shares for the money they had already promised to intel from the CHIPS act.Admin said:after the U.S. Government had invested its own $8.9 billion into Intel.
So what's the difference?!Hotaru251 said:tin foil hat possibility: now they have incentive for their product to work better w/ intel.
They always had incentive for their product to work better with the CPU that is in like 90% of x86 PCs.
Or at least was, and we didn't see any change in how well nvidia runs with AMD in the last few years where we saw more AMD cpus in PCs. -
ezst036 It would be quite interesting if Nvidia ended up buying out Intel in total. I'm sure we are a long way from that but still. That would be crazy if it happened.Reply -
TerryLaze Reply
The FTC didn't allow nvidia to buy arm and had to allow even this transaction.ezst036 said:It would be quite interesting if Nvidia ended up buying out Intel in total. I'm sure we are a long way from that but still. That would be crazy if it happened.
There is no way the FTC would allow a full buy out. (To nvidia) -
ezst036 Reply
Perhaps they should.TerryLaze said:The FTC didn't allow nvidia to buy arm and had to allow even this transaction.
There is no way the FTC would allow a full buy out. (To nvidia)
Otherwise the FTC might just be setting everybody up for more failure and another bailout.
Intel should not receive another bailout, if they can't get their act together then they need to sell themselves off to a capable entity. Time to die.
(I don't really like Nvidia but they are capable.) -
TerryLaze Reply
Another?! Which one do you think was the first?!ezst036 said:Perhaps they should.
Otherwise the FTC might just be setting everybody up for more failure and another bailout.
Intel should not receive another bailout, if they can't get their act together then they need to sell themselves off to a capable entity. Time to die.
(I don't really like Nvidia but they are capable.)
CHIPS wasn't a bail out, not for intel at least, it was to incentivize companies to keep or create more work in the USA, so you could call it a bail out for the gov.
But then they turned around and stole shares for that money, a hostile takeover is not a bail out. -
Bigshrimp More circular investments. Seems like no real new money is being generated, just spending on each other's companies. Basically taking money from one company, giving it to another, then that company gives it to another company, and the circle continues.Reply