The U.S. Air Force prohibits troops from using smart glasses—earphones and other Bluetooth devices are also restricted to official duties while in uniform
The US Air Force reacts to emerging consumer technologies that can compromise operation security.
Get 3DTested's best news and in-depth reviews, straight to your inbox.
You are now subscribed
Your newsletter sign-up was successful
The U.S. Air Force has prohibited all personnel from using smart glasses and has restricted the use of earphones and other Bluetooth devices while in uniform during official duties. According to its dress and personal appearance policy announcement, “It is unauthorized to wear mirrored lenses or smart glasses with photo, video, or artificial intelligence capabilities while in uniform.” Furthermore, the use of earbuds — specifically Earpieces, headphones, or any Bluetooth wireless technology — is now restricted to personnel cleared for official duties.
The announcement did not specify why these devices were prohibited from use while in uniform, other than stating it was “designed to uphold military professionalism” and to foster “a more effective and mission-ready Force.” However, though not explicitly stated, smart glasses frequently capture photos and videos automatically, which are subsequently synced to the cloud. This is a dire scenario for operational security, since it might accidentally expose classified details, particularly for individuals stationed at or around top secret facilities.
In addition, it banned uniformed personnel from using earbuds, whether wired or wireless, unless explicitly permitted for official duties. The restriction also applied to the use of personal electronic media devices, such as earpieces, speakerphones, or text messaging, while walking, except in emergencies or when required for official communications. Nevertheless, the regulation included a few exceptions — uniformed personnel may use them while commuting on public transit or while wearing athletic attire during individual or unit fitness activities Instruction.
Public tracking technology has long posed a challenge for military forces. It first became evident in 2018, when fitness apps such as Strava and Polar, started showing where their users were taking their runs. This accidentally exposed the location and arrangement of several U.S. Bases—even the classified ones. Even though the users stayed anonymous, jogging trails that suddenly materialized suggested that an installation existed there. Aligning with publicly accessible exercise data greatly simplifies verifying open-source intelligence, heightening the base’s operational threats.
Smart glasses are also emerging as a notable threat, particularly as they’ve grown more discreet and advanced. 3DTested’s review of the Ray-Ban Meta Glasses reveal that they appear as a completely ordinary pair of glasses, yet retain the capacity to record what the user sees and hears. And while the Ray-Bans feature a white LED light on the frame to show they’re recording, some users managed to turn it off. This allowed them to be used for covert recording.
This threat also reaches beyond malicious elements inside the U.S. Air Force. The service currently employs more than 300,000 active-duty personnel — meaning that even if only 1% of them adopt smart glasses, that still amounts to 3,000 smart devices requiring monitoring and strengthening against cyber threats. So, to keep it straightforward, it simply opted to fully prohibit smart devices for those in uniform.
Follow 3DTested on Google News, or add us as a preferred source, to get our latest news, analysis, & reviews in your feeds.
Get 3DTested's best news and in-depth reviews, straight to your inbox.

-
Findecanor I don't think there should just be just specific bans of specific types of devices. That's reactive security.Reply
There should be proactive security.
Personell in security-sensitive environments should be educated in what devices could do and what security risks that are associated with them, so that they think before bringing devices in.
At one workplace I've had, you had to get your device vetted before it was allowed on the premises. -
btmedic04 Just wait until yall find out that our military uniforms have pockets and youre not allowed to keep your hands in them 🤣Reply -
COLGeek Reply
Ah, you refer to "air force gloves" as we soldiers called to them. Yep, those were definitely an Army fashion faux pas.btmedic04 said:Just wait until yall find out that our military uniforms have pockets and youre not allowed to keep your hands in them 🤣 -
bobingus Reply
This is proactive security. They are banning potentially compromised devices before they become a problem. That's proactive.Findecanor said:I don't think there should just be just specific bans of specific types of devices. That's reactive security.
There should be proactive security.
Personell in security-sensitive environments should be educated in what devices could do and what security risks that are associated with them, so that they think before bringing devices in.
At one workplace I've had, you had to get your device vetted before it was allowed on the premises.
Reactive security would be waiting until some goober leaks national Security secrets using his Meta glasses and then deciding maybe it's a good idea to ban them.
Law enforcement and other agencies are already getting way too comfortable wearing surveillance glasses that are controlled by weird billionaire oligarchs who are obviously and visibly interfering with government operations. Those Meta glasses are all over the place slurping up data and streaming it all into Facebook (and Palintir) servers with God knows what else. ICE agents are using them a LOT for some reason 🤔
There is no valid argument to be wearing third-party recording devices while in military uniform or in military installations. If you need to record things, there are already an entire list of approved devices at your disposal. Putting national security in the hands of companies that have shown a dozen times a year they can't be trusted with that level of authority is just careless. -
USAFRet Reply
That education already happens.Findecanor said:Personell in security-sensitive environments should be educated in what devices could do and what security risks that are associated with them, so that they think before bringing devices in.
And people still make mistakes. -
palladin9479 ReplyFindecanor said:I don't think there should just be just specific bans of specific types of devices. That's reactive security.
There should be proactive security.
Personell in security-sensitive environments should be educated in what devices could do and what security risks that are associated with them, so that they think before bringing devices in.
At one workplace I've had, you had to get your device vetted before it was allowed on the premises.
All PED's (personal electronic devices) are prohibited from being brought into sensitive locations, those locations are loudly marked and are not the kinds of places you randomly walk into. If for whatever reason an uncleared person needs to walk into those locations, they are announced and held until the area is sanitized first. The issue with smart glasses is that it might not be evident someone is wearing them and you can end up with an otherwise cleared person walking around in a location with a recording device that absolutely should not be there. Normally if this happens, the device is seized and all material is sanitized from it, aka it gets nuked and wiped clean regardless.
Yes if you bring a cell phone into my vault, it's going to be taken and completely wiped, if you are lucky it'll be returned, otherwise kiss it good bye. These smart glass's are sending everything to "the cloud", aka someone else's datacenter, and it's not possible to clean that kind of spillage (official term for it). So best thing is to just outright prohibit them across the board. Has the side benefit of also preventing someone from sending SBU (sensitive but unclassified) to "someone else's datacenter", and for the Military almost everything that isn't classified is SBU. Emails, notes, meetings, all the paperwork on your desk, practically everything that gets touched has some sort of operational impact even if it's not classified. -
USAFRet Reply
Similar at my location.palladin9479 said:All PED's (personal electronic devices) are prohibited from being brought into sensitive locations, those locations are loudly marked and are not the kinds of places you randomly walk into. If for whatever reason an uncleared person needs to walk into those locations, they are announced and held until the area is sanitized first. The issue with smart glasses is that it might not be evident someone is wearing them and you can end up with an otherwise cleared person walking around in a location with a recording device that absolutely should not be there. Normally if this happens, the device is seized and all material is sanitized from it, aka it gets nuked and wiped clean regardless.
Yes if you bring a cell phone into my vault, it's going to be taken and completely wiped, if you are lucky it'll be returned, otherwise kiss it good bye. These smart glass's are sending everything to "the cloud", aka someone else's datacenter, and it's not possible to clean that kind of spillage (official term for it). So best thing is to just outright prohibit them across the board. Has the side benefit of also preventing someone from sending SBU (sensitive but unclassified) to "someone else's datacenter", and for the Military almost everything that isn't classified is SBU. Emails, notes, meetings, all the paperwork on your desk, practically everything that gets touched has some sort of operational impact even if it's not classified.
But our entire building is 'the vault'. With a WiFi/bluetooth sensor at the door.
Any signal (oops, I forgot the phone in my pocket), and it screams loudly.
But no camera/USB stick/phone/PDA/whatever.... -
meski42 Uh, lots of private companies forbid the operation of cameras on their premises. I've not seen it enforced much.Reply -
das_stig US Air Force bans use of smart glasses among its troops — can't find enough smart airmen/woman:tonguewink:Reply