South Korean exchange's $40B Bitcoin mistake casts pall over country's fledgling crypto legislation — staffer fat-fingered 620,000 BTC instead of Korean Won

Bitcoin gold
(Image credit: Getty Images)

A couple days ago, South Korean crypto outfit Bithumb ran a promotion distributing small amounts of cash for engagement. Eligible folks could get prizes from a total pool worth a combined 620,000 ₩, about $425. The problem: a staffer input 620,000 BTC into the promotion instead, causing a $40 billion problem, granting millions to multiple people temporarily, and causing the exchange's BTC/KRW exchange pair to drop 17%.

The incident lasted 30 minutes and was contained to Bithumb's internal database, as by definition, the blockchain doesn't allow for currency to appear out of thin air. However, the fact that it was even possible for an exchange to issue 15 times its holdings (naked short selling) raised more than a few eyebrows, particularly in the South Korean financial world, where cryptocurrency trading is partially legislated and close to becoming fully legalized.

According to Reuters, Bithumb ended up reversing the transactions and recovered 99.7% of the issued BTC. South Korean law (paraphrased) states that people given funds out of nowhere are legally obligated to return them. That was the case with the vast majority of giftees, and Bithumb has legal standing to sue people who don't return the funds. Those who contacted the exchange for confirmation before withdrawing may be able to contest the claw-back.

Article continues below

Google Preferred Source

Follow 3DTested on Google News, or add us as a preferred source, to get our latest news, analysis, & reviews in your feeds.

Bruno Ferreira
Contributor
  • edzieba
    Regardless of the currency or lack thereof (e.g. Liquid assets such as futures contracts), exchanges always have been and always will be vulnerable to fat-fingering. E.g. A $100m whoopsie, a near >$600 Billion misclick, a $35 billion transfer (more than the bank held, etc. Some reversed, some not.
    Reply