Chinese scientists have created a new alloy reaching -

Microsoft Quantum materials
(Image credit: Microsoft)

Scientists from China have developed a new cooling technology based on a rare-earth alloy that can reach temperatures close to absolute zero without relying on helium-3, reports South China Morning Post. Such an alloy could enable compact, helium-3-free cooling systems for superconducting quantum chips, advanced electronics used by military equipment, and space applications.

The researchers created a small-scale, solid-state cooling device devoid of mechanical components that hit 106 millikelvin (mK), which equals -273°C, a temperature normally reached by utilizing liquid helium. The refrigeration system depended on a rare-earth substance made of europium, cobalt, and aluminum (EuCo₂Al₉, ECA), which displays heat transfer properties akin to metals, while additionally being able to chill itself and additional components efficiently using adiabatic demagnetization (ADR), the method that does all the magic behind the discovery.

Article continues below

Historically, ADR has had a major weakness: the materials used could get cold themselves, but they were not very good at transferring that cold to other components. This limited their usefulness in real systems. Simultaneously, the EuCo₂Al₉ substance engineered by the group of researchers performs this very function: it can chill itself and additional parts, permitting helium-3-free refrigeration setups to be capable of cooling components to almost absolute zero Temperatures possible.

Google Preferred Source

Follow 3DTested on Google News, or add us as a preferred source, to obtain our newest reports, breakdowns, & appraisals via your feeds.

Anton Shilov
Contributing Writer
  • Faiakes
    So could this be applied to PC cooling?
    Reply
  • micheal_15
    Please remember China just makes stuff up.

    They lied about the original moon lander probe. They lied about homegrown CPUs, they lied about tianamen square. They lied about having GPUs equal to NVIDIA.

    If we believe everything China says, then we'd think they have FTL spaceships that could beat the enterprise in combat, personal teleporters, have defeated death and time, and God himself says prayers to XI every night before bed.
    Reply
  • coolitic
    micheal_15 said:
    Please remember China just makes stuff up.

    They lied about the original moon lander probe. They lied about homegrown CPUs, they lied about tianamen square. They lied about having GPUs equal to NVIDIA.

    If we believe everything China says, then we'd think they have FTL spaceships that could beat the enterprise in combat, personal teleporters, have defeated death and time, and God himself says prayers to XI every night before bed.
    I would say that my reason for doubting chiefly stems from the fact that this "discovery" was announced just two weeks after DARPA announced their push. That's a little too convenient to not be engineered.

    That being said, it's likely that their research had already undergone some degree of progress, and their announcement was a fluffed up reflection of that to score a point against the US. So I'm not discarding anything completely here, but it's kind of impossible to tell to what degree it's true or not, as is typical w/ China.

    So, as per usual, I'll believe it when it exists in a functioning product.
    Reply
  • JamesJones44
    micheal_15 said:
    Please remember China just makes stuff up.

    They lied about the original moon lander probe. They lied about homegrown CPUs, they lied about tianamen square. They lied about having GPUs equal to NVIDIA.

    If we believe everything China says, then we'd think they have FTL spaceships that could beat the enterprise in combat, personal teleporters, have defeated death and time, and God himself says prayers to XI every night before bed.

    Don't forget Winnie the Pooh is also the enemy!
    Reply
  • chaos215bar2
    So, do we have a published paper explaining exactly how the cooling process using this new alloy works, or just a news article from a Chinese source specifically calling out DARPA?

    The big problem that comes to mind is, how does this alloy dissipate heat without dumping some of it into the object intended to be cooled? With a standard helium cryostat, this is simple enough and not fundamentally that different from the standard refrigeration cycle. (Well, it's pretty different, but the helium carries the heat away, just like any refrigerant would.)

    Can this alloy selectively dump its heat in one direction? Or was the test just a one off, capable of briefly reaching the desired temperatures but not necessarily maintaining them over any period of time?
    Reply
  • TCA_ChinChin
    micheal_15 said:
    Please remember China just makes stuff up.

    Coolitic said:
    I would say that my reason for doubting chiefly stems from the fact that this "discovery" was announced just two weeks after DARPA announced their push. That's a little too convenient to not be engineered.

    Chaos215bar2 said:
    So, do we have a published paper explaining exactly how the cooling process using this new alloy works, or just a news article from a Chinese source specifically calling out DARPA?
    Here is the article published in Nature:
    https://www.nature.com/articles/s41586-026-10144-zThe news source is kinda bad for not linking the actual published paper, but it's real research and actually legitimately in one of the most prestigious scientific journals globally.
    Reply
  • Geef
    I added this story to my post:
    List of stories with the 'CLAIMS' and 'COULD BE' or 'MAY.'
    Reply
  • chaos215bar2
    TCA_ChinChin said:
    Here is the article published in Nature:
    https://www.nature.com/articles/s41586-026-10144-zThe news source is kinda bad for not linking the actual published paper, but it's real research and actually legitimately in one of the most prestigious scientific journals globally.
    Too bad there doesn't seem to be a plain PDF copy available anywhere.

    I guess it's a little harder to complain since the research was funded within China, but still, the idea of paying $30+ simply to access a single scientific paper is so counter to the kind of open communication scientific progress thrives on, it's almost insulting.
    Reply