'Thermodynamic computing' could slash energy use of AI image generation by a factor of ten billion, study claims — prototypes show promise but huge task required to create hardware that can rival current models
An account already exists for this email address, please log in.
Subscribe to our newsletter
A mind-bending new report claims that 'thermodynamic computing' could, in theory, drastically reduce the energy consumed by AI to generate images, using just one ten-billionth of the energy of current popular tools. As reported by IEEE Spectrum, two recent studies hint at the potential of this burgeoning technology, but its proponents admit the solution is rudimentary.
According to the report, Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory staff scientist Stephen Withelam claims thermodynamic computing could be used for AI image generation "with a much lower energy cost than current digital hardware can." In a January 10 article published by Whitelam and Corneel Casert, also of Berkeley, the pair outlined how "it was possible to create a thermodynamic version of a neural network," laying the foundations for generating images using thermodynamic computing.
According to the report, the thermodynamic computer is given a set of images, and then left to let the images degrade. The natural random interactions run until equilibrium is achieved between the computer's components. The computer is then tasked with working out the probability of reversing this decay process, before adjusting the values to make that as likely as possible.
Whitelam followed this research up with an article in Physical Review Letters on January 20, in which he details that this process can be used to create a thermodynamic computer that can be used to generate the image of some handwritten digits.
Naturally, that's a long way off the intense image generation capabilities of Google Gemini's Nano Banana Pro, or any other AI image generator you can think of. However, it serves as a proof of concept that somehow, one day, thermodynamic computing could be used for AI image generation.
"This research suggests that it’s possible to make hardware to do certain types of machine learning," Whitelam told IEEE. Specifically, "image generation — with considerably lower energy cost than we do at present." Given how rudimentary this proof of concept is, Whitelam warns that thermodynamic image generation to rival mainstream options is a long way off. "We don’t yet know how to design a thermodynamic computer that would be as good at image generation as, say, DALL-E," he reportedly said. "It will still be necessary to work out how to build the hardware to do this.”
Stay On the Cutting Edge: Get the 3DTested Newsletter
Get 3DTested's best news and in-depth reviews, straight to your inbox.
That's quite the catch, but in a world where AI buildouts and data center growth are putting unprecedented strain on global energy supply, a future process that could reduce AI image generation energy usage by a factor of ten billion would certainly be a breakthrough.
Major datacenters should also be their own power plants, essentially using heat pumps to turn steam turbines to turn generators. It boggles my mind that the wealthiest and most hi-tech companies in the world throw away heat (and often) water with little to no recapture.
Major datacenters should also be their own power plants, essentially using heat pumps to turn steam turbines to turn generators. It boggles my mind that the wealthiest and most hi-tech companies in the world throw away heat (and often) water with little to no recapture.
They throw away a lot of heat but it's at low temperatures and that's very hard to recapture efficiently, you can't really boil water with it, you might boil some ammonia if you can cool the ammonia enough in the first place, or design some big honkin' Sterling engine with a boosted cooling cycle... That would be awesome. Would it ever pay for itself? Dubious.
They throw away a lot of heat but it's at low temperatures and that's very hard to recapture efficiently, you can't really boil water with it, you might boil some ammonia if you can cool the ammonia enough in the first place, or design some big honkin' Sterling engine with a boosted cooling cycle... That would be awesome. Would it ever pay for itself? Dubious.
That's true, and it would take additional input (heat pump, etc.) To concentrate that thermal energy into higher usable temps, destroying efficiency and overall value of the system.
Still, it's hard for me to imagine that we can throw away 300 MW or even more (besides heating the DC itself, which we know is rarely the case based on the fact that most DC's are located in warmer climates) from a single DC.
Our ancestors from long ago did really clever things to survive and thrive. We're not so clever today; if the economics work out, that's generally good enough.
