GrapheneOS refuses to comply with new age verification laws for operating systems — group says it will never require personal information

GrapheneOS, the privacy-focused Android fork, said in a post on X on Friday that it will not comply with emerging laws requiring operating systems to collect user age data at setup. "GrapheneOS will remain usable by anyone around the world without requiring personal information, identification or an account," the project stated. "If GrapheneOS devices can't be sold in a region due to their regulations, so be it."

The statement came after Brazil's Digital ECA (Law 15.211) took effect on March 17, imposing fines of up to R$50 million (roughly $9.5 million) per violation on operating system providers that fail to implement age verification. California's Digital Age Assurance Act (AB-1043), signed by Governor Newsom in October 2025, takes effect on January 1, 2027, and requires every OS provider to collect a user's age or date of birth during account setup and pipe that data to app stores and developers through a real-time API. Colorado's SB26-051 passed the state senate on March 3 with similar requirements.

GrapheneOS is developed by the GrapheneOS Foundation, a registered Canadian nonprofit. None of these laws originate in Canada, but questions around jurisdiction remain open. U.S. Federal prosecutors successfully extradited and convicted the developers of Samourai Wallet, a privacy-focused Bitcoin mixer, in a case where one defendant lived in Portugal. California's AB-1043 carries civil penalties of up to $2,500 per affected child for negligent violations and $7,500 for intentional ones, enforced by the state attorney general.

Article continues below

Motorola and GrapheneOS announced a long-term partnership at MWC on March 2, to bring to bring the hardened OS to future Motorola hardware, ending GrapheneOS's long-standing exclusivity to Google Pixel devices. A GrapheneOS-powered Motorola phone is expected in 2027. If Motorola sells devices with GrapheneOS pre-installed, those devices would need to comply with local regulations in every market where they ship, or Motorola may need to restrict sales geographically.

GrapheneOS isn’t the first and won’t be the last company to outright refuse compliance with incoming age verification laws. The developers of open-source calculator firmware DB48X issued a legal notice recently, stating that their software "does not, cannot and will not implement age verification,” while MidnightBSD updated its license to ban users in Brazil.

California's law doesn’t require photo ID or biometric verification; users simply self-report their age during setup. Critics, including over 400 computer scientists who signed an open letter, have argued that the laws create surveillance infrastructure without meaningfully protecting children, since self-declaration is trivially bypassed.

Google Preferred Source

Follow 3DTested on Google News, or add us as a preferred source, to get our latest news, analysis, & reviews in your feeds.

Luke James
Contributor
  • wolfferth
    we already know it's not about "age verification". Everyone gets an inmate# and it's required to run the global bold project / spare parts live stock project.
    Reply
  • usertests
    wolfferth said:
    we already know it's not about "age verification". Everyone gets an inmate# and it's required to run the global bold project / spare parts live stock project.
    Grim but true.
    Reply
  • LordVile
    wolfferth said:
    we already know it's not about "age verification". Everyone gets an inmate# and it's required to run the global bold project / spare parts live stock project.
    Stop being silly
    Reply
  • Zaranthos
    They want a digital fingerprint on everything so they can track you from birth to death. We need a lot more "up yours" and bird flipping to the surveillance state.
    Reply
  • Notton
    Good for them.
    I just want to add AB-1043 has this written in it.
    "1798.500
    (c) “Application” means a software application that may be run or directed by a user on a computer, a mobile device, or any other general purpose computing device that can access a covered application store or download an application."

    I'm sure dictionaries define a "Dictionary" as a dictionary too.
    Reply
  • LordVile
    Do does this mean if I install it on my phone they’d get fined?
    Reply
  • beyondlogic
    Let's be real if people just used parental controls on devices and actually learned to implement them instead of blaming every software company under the sun for there bad decisions we wouldn't have this nanny crap of id every website program under the sun lol.

    It's shocking how many parents don't even know there's parent controls on android and Xbox etc.
    Reply
  • SomeoneElse23
    Good for them.

    I may have to check them out now.
    Reply