Los Angeles aims to ban single-use printer cartridges — new ordinance will target ink and toner that can't be properly recycled

Printer cartridges in the trash
(Image credit: Getty Images)

Most printers, laser or inkjet, are powered by cartridges that are single-use by design; you have to buy a new one when the old one runs out. This is exacerbated by the DRM-infested curfews manufacturers often put on these things, so you usually can't just refill them yourself. Thankfully, the city of Los Angeles is looking to put an end to the reign of archaic printing norms.

The City Council has voted to create an ordinance that will ban single-use printer cartridges that can't be refilled or that don't have a take-back program offered by the vendor. This includes basically any ink or toner module that's bound to end up in landfill — unable to be properly recycled and therefore in the way of Los Angeles' zero-waste ambitions.

Printer cartridges are usually built with a combination of plastic, metal, and chemicals that makes them hard to easily dispose. They can be treated as hazardous waste by the city, but even then it would take them hundreds of years to actually disintegrate at a waste site. Since they're designed to be thrown away in the first place, the real solution is to target the root of the issue — hence the ban.

To be clear, the LA City Council isn't trying to solve the printer ink crisis or even address affordability — most people only take into account the upfront shelf cost of a printer. The angle is environmental, tied closely to reducing unnecessary loops in the distribution pipeline. Even if the vendor is supposed to collect the empty cartridge from you, there's no point if it's being discarded on your behalf.

Brother genuine toner

Brother is a popular printer company that generally serves as an antidote to the established players (Image credit: Brother)

Google Preferred Source

Follow 3DTested on Google News, or add us as a preferred source, to get our latest news, analysis, & reviews in your feeds.

Hassam Nasir
Contributing Writer
  • Li Ken-un
    I want to know what sorry excuse Big Printer comes up with to defend the status quo.
    Reply
  • bill001g
    This is a interesting way to in effect try to force refillable options from the big printer manufactures.

    What I wonder is what happens if the companies decide to ignore laws passed by a city. Will they try to enforce it against the consumer by making possession illegal. They could stop sale in stores inside the city limits but this would just hurt the local business when people drive to the next city or in some cases walk across the street. How would they ever stop amazon shipments.
    Sure they might make a company take carts back to "recycle" but what will they do when the company drives outside the city limits and puts them in a dumpster.

    Cities like all government are some of the worst offenders when it comes to paper documents. When they pass the law the printer manufacture should just post a video of the CEO giving the city the finger. The cities only option is to buy a brand new printer from a manufacture that offers refillable options.
    Reply
  • Li Ken-un
    bill001g said:
    Cities like all government are some of the worst offenders when it comes to paper documents.
    That depends on the agency or department. Across the different ones I’ve worked with, the desks were almost barren—maybe a mini Christmas tree for a month out of the year and some photos pinned to the cubicle. All people needed were the dual-monitor thin clients into Azure Virtual Desktop and the documents stored within.

    I honestly come up blank when I’m asked when the last time I had to print a page was. And the only time I’ve had to deal with paper was with my old-school accountant who wouldn’t take/send e-mail attachments or flash drives for fear of compromising his machine. So every year after I do my taxes, I take home a big packet of paper. All the other paper that comes in the mail is spam (credit card offers, political advertisements, etc.).

    I’d be glad if the city corners itself into going all digital with this rule if the printer manufacturers don’t want to play along.
    Reply
  • jkflipflop98
    If it's really getting that bad, it's time to start thinking a little bigger for a solution other than banning printer ink.
    Reply
  • JamesJones44
    bill001g said:
    What I wonder is what happens if the companies decide to ignore laws passed by a city. Will they try to enforce it against the consumer by making possession illegal
    It will take years to get someone like aliexpress to comply. China doesn't care about one city in the US blocking sales for a low volume item. Not to mention people can just get a mailbox outside of the city limits and have items like this shipped there if and when they can ever get online sellers to comply.
    Reply
  • sadsteve
    Hm, I never thought about it since I always brought my empty cartridges to OfficeMax or Staples.

    I do a bit of (free) printing for a veterinarian that does low cost shots at a pet supply store on alternating Saturdays. Basically, it's the shots record for the pet owner. Maybe 20 to 30 pages per Saturday.
    Reply