Western Digital doubles the performance of hard drives with dual-actuator High-Bandwidth, with path to 8X performance increase — Power-Optimized HDDs will reduce power by 20 percent

Roadmap
(Image credit: 3DTested)

Although NAND memory has replaced traditional hard disk drives in the vast majority of client PCs, HDDs can still offer capacities at costs not achievable by solid-state drives today, particularly in the data center space. In a bid to retain the relevance of hard drives for years to come, Western Digital on Tuesday announced two distinct families of HDDs: one aimed at applications that require maximum performance and decent IOPS-per-TB, another designed for power-optimized applications that value limited power consumption and predictable performance.

High-Bandwidth HDD

The whole concept of Western Digital's High-Bandwidth HDD stems from reading data from the media using more than one head and transferring it to one or two hosts. The company showcases two types of High-Bandwidth HDDs at its Innovation Day: one uses more than one head for reading and writing at the same time to achieve 2X bandwidth compared to conventional HDDs, and another one features a second fully independent actuator to achieve 2X bandwidth and 2X sequential I/O performance. Over time, High-Bandwidth HDDs are projected to scale up bandwidth by eight times and I/O by four times when both approaches are combined within a single HDD.

WD's original dual-actuator High-Bandwidth HDD architecture — which is already being validated by the company's clients — allows multiple heads on multiple tracks to read and write simultaneously, thus exploiting internal parallelism to deliver 2X bandwidth of traditional 3.5-inch HDDs.

The next step for Western Digital is its Dual-Pivot High-Bandwidth HDD architecture is to add a second, fully independent actuator on a separate pivot inside the same 3.5-inch drive. Each actuator controls its own set of heads and enables two independent read/write operations at once, thus delivering up to 2X sequential I/O performance without reducing capacity. Dual-Pivot HDDs are currently in the lab and are targeted to become available in 2028. Over time, the two architectures will be combined to deliver 4X higher I/O performance compared to traditional hard drives.

Power-Optimized HDDs

In addition to offering High-Bandwidth drives for performance-demanding applications, Western Digital is also working on Power-Optimized HDDs that reduce power consumption by 20% for 'active cold' storage tier.

Western Digital positions Power-Optimized HDDs for 'active cold' storage tier for AI workloads that generate massive volumes of data — such as datasets, checkpoints, and logs — which must remain quickly accessible (which rules out tape), but cannot be stored on traditional high-capacity HDDs or SSDs due to cost concerns.

The company says that these power-optimized 3.5-inch HDDs use a 'minimal random IO' for 20% less power than conventional drives, which reduces ownership costs and makes 'active cold' storage cheaper to run. WD expects the first power-optimized HDDs to enter customer qualification in 2027.

Competing with QLC-based SSDs

Although High-Bandwidth and Power Optimized HDDs serve completely different purposes, they are paradoxically designed to rival the wide product category — data center-grade 3D QLC NAND-based SSDs. Such drives can offer storage density and performance that cannot be achieved by modern HDDs. However, by tailoring features and performance of hard disk drives for particular applications, Western Digital believes it can offer better value than QLC NAND-based SSDs.

Google Preferred Source

Follow 3DTested on Google News, or add us as a preferred source, to get our latest news, analysis, & reviews in your feeds.

Anton Shilov
Contributing Writer
With contributions from
  • Kindaian
    And what is the cost in terms of endurance of the disks?
    Reply
  • LordVile
    In continuous read and writes sure but IOPS will still be far lower
    Reply
  • FunSurfer
    Current SATA III connection maximum speed is 550–600 MB/s, usually HDD operates at 100 MB/s, so how will it reach X8 speed, 800 MB/s? Will it work with other communication type, like USB, PCIe or NVMe?
    Reply
  • MosephV
    FunSurfer said:
    Current SATA III connection maximum speed is 550–600 MB/s, usually HDD operates at 100 MB/s, so how will it reach X8 speed, 800 MB/s? Will it work with other communication type, like USB, PCIe or NVMe?
    My guess is SAS, which has double the bandwidth of SATA III. It's also the most common interface for spinning rust in the data center
    Reply
  • Dr Kay
    FunSurfer said:
    Current SATA III connection maximum speed is 550–600 MB/s, usually HDD operates at 100 MB/s, so how will it reach X8 speed, 800 MB/s? Will it work with other communication type, like USB, PCIe or NVMe?
    I was going to ask EXACTLY the same question and I think these HDD manufacturers might adopt the PCI E interface for faster speeds as you already stated that the SATA III interface max's out at around 550- 600 MB/s so if they do manage 8 x the speed of today's fastest HDD's then 8 x 600 MB/s = 4,800 MB/s which is inline of PCI E gen 4 or 5 speed's. I do apologise if I've made any mistakes in my maths or reasoning.
    Reply
  • Shiznizzle
    SATA transfer speeds in the lab do not translate to real world scenarios.

    People today tend to shove and cram their cables in bunches into the back which does interfere with signal strength. I am getting 170 to 180 with one reading head so my guess is with two we could be looking at 300MB/s which is not shabby for spinning rust. Put a few drives in an array and numbers go up further.

    Just glad they moved away from SMR.
    Reply
  • twin_savage
    Shiznizzle said:
    I am getting 170 to 180 with one reading head so my guess is with two we could be looking at 300MB/s which is not shabby for spinning rust. Put a few drives in an array and numbers go up further.
    I'm getting 587MB/s out of the old first generation mach.2 drives on sequential workloads; I'd expect these new WD drives to be atleast that good.


    EDIT:
    I just realized there is a picture in the article claiming the drives can transfer at 554.1MB/s
    Reply
  • twin_savage
    Dr Kay said:
    was going to ask EXACTLY the same question and I think these HDD manufacturers might adopt the PCI E interface for faster speeds
    back 2021 the new NVMe 2.0 spec added in hard drives, but IIRC they only allow them to be linked at 2 lanes instead of 4.
    Reply
  • JRStern
    Dr Kay said:
    I was going to ask EXACTLY the same question and I think these HDD manufacturers might adopt the PCI E interface for faster speeds as you already stated that the SATA III interface max's out at around 550- 600 MB/s so if they do manage 8 x the speed of today's fastest HDD's then 8 x 600 MB/s = 4,800 MB/s which is inline of PCI E gen 4 or 5 speed's. I do apologise if I've made any mistakes in my maths or reasoning.
    Rotational delay. Sorry, meant seek delay, just that much less of it.
    Reply
  • JRStern
    Cool. Head per track, fixed. Aka "drum". Back to 1965! OK at about a billion times the capacity, LOL.

    Now wait, I thought I was kidding, but given another three seconds consideration - perhaps such a thing could actually be done? If so, OMG.
    Reply