DLSS Ray Reconstruction might be living on borrowed time, DLSS 4.5 can reconstruct ray-traced reflections almost perfectly without any denoisers
Who needs Ray Reconstruction when the upscaler itself can do the same thing
Get 3DTested's best news and in-depth reviews, straight to your inbox.
You are now subscribed
Your newsletter sign-up was successful
DLSS 4.5 has proven to be an impressive upgrade over DLSS 4.0 in some areas. Not only does the new model provide superior upscaling quality, but it can also outright improve the visual fidelity of 3D graphics. Building on the latter, Digital Foundry discovered that both DLSS 4.5 Presets M and L are capable of reconstructing ray-traced reflections almost perfectly (depending on the game), as long as in-game denoisers are turned off.
Digital Foundry saw this behavior in Crysis 3 and Silent Hill 2, where DLSS 4.5 produced noticeably better ray-traced image quality with each game's denoiser turned off compared to with them turned on. In Crysis 3, turning off the engine's denoiser resulted in less boiling, and in Silent Hill 2, turning off the denoiser resulted in a night-and-day difference in reflection quality — to the point where there was almost no image blurring or boiling to be seen.
Boiling and image noise are problems that ray-traced effects naturally produce. Game developers use denoisers to remove these artifacts. However, one caveat with these filters is that they generally do not produce a perfect image. This is why you'll find objects or textures in ray-traced reflections looking oily or smeared.
NVIDIA introduced DLSS Ray Reconstruction to help solve this problem, and Ray Reconstruction itself generally provides better image quality with AI, compared to the capabilities of traditional denoisers. This has especially been the case with DLSS 4's Ray Reconstruction transformer model, which produces noticeably superior image quality compared to the initial DLSS 3.5 version.
What we are seeing with DLSS 4.5 is very unique. NVIDIA has tuned the transformer model of its DLSS upscaler so well that it alone can remove the aforementioned artifacts that ray tracing effects generate naturally. Also, DLSS 4.5 is doing this without Ray Reconstruction — since Ray Reconstruction has not yet been updated to support the newer DLSS 4.5 model.
If Nvidia can fully leverage this feature and improve it, we could very well see it stop supporting Ray Reconstruction (or, rename it and bake it into the upscaler portion of DLSS instead, at a future date). This would simplify DLSS and make life potentially easier for developers to incorporate DLSS into ray tracing games, as they would not need to worry about Ray Reconstruction integration.
However, this will all depend on how effective DLSS 4.5 is at denoising. Digital Foundry is the only outlet we've seen so far that's covered this behavior in-depth, and it has only covered it in just two titles. There could be issues with DLSS 4.5's denoising capabilities in other ray tracing games and/or effects that we are not aware of at this point. Also, DLSS 4.5 handles upscaling with in-game denosing turned on worse, compared to DLSS 4. This is critical since not all ray-tracing games officially allow gamers to disable a game's built-in denoiser.
Follow 3DTested on Google News, or add us as a preferred source, to get our latest news, analysis, & reviews in your feeds.
Get 3DTested's best news and in-depth reviews, straight to your inbox.

-
Pierce2623 Somebody needs to tell the author that ray reconstruction applies to path tracing and is necessary to get the current level of performance. Traditional single bounce ray tracing doesn’t need it in the first place.Reply -
DingusDog If this does ever come to fruition, I'm sure Nvidia will restrict it to 6000 series cards. Yay!Reply -
Talsakun I feel author took the wrong message from the Digital Foundry video. The video was about how in-game denoisers weren't playing nicely with DLSS 4.5 models, and yes, there was massive improvement when you turned off the former. But to go from there to assert that RR, which is in itself an accomplished denoiser separate from in-game traditional implementation, may soon be obsoleted is a wild leap. RR is a dedicated ML-based denoiser that will always outperform an upscaler trying to denoise at the same time. Also, denoising is just one of its jobs. The 'reconstruction' in RR has to do with upscaling ray-tracing components of the image, which allows for more detailed RT effects with fewer 'raw' rays being sampled (leading to perfomance gains). Just like normal dlss gives you a sharper image from lower rendered resolution. It's not just the denoising.Reply -
orta23 Might also be important to note that it sounds like there's a lighter form of RR built into the dll for M and LReply