Former Samsung engineer accused of giving 10nm DRAM data to China's CXMT, handwritten notes detailed over 600 process steps — gas flow ratios, photoresist settings and more critical stages detailed

Intel
(Image credit: Intel)

Last week, South Korean prosecutors indicted multiple individuals in a case alleging that a former Samsung engineer leaked advanced DRAM manufacturing process data to China’s ChangXin Memory Technologies (CXMT), shedding light on how leaked trade secrets may have accelerated China’s push into 10nm-class memory. Now, it has come to light (via SemiAnalysis) that the engineers in question allegedly took note of detailed critical manufacturing steps in handwritten notes taken over five years.

The former Samsung engineer was arrested for offences under the Unfair Competition Prevention Act and the Industrial Technology Protection Act for allegedly passing along information on Samsung’s sub-10nm DRAM process before CXMT began mass production of comparable memory in 2024, two years earlier than expected. This may have caused trillions of losses in Korean Won for both Samsung and South Korea. Meanwhile, CXMT is expected to capture as much as 15% of the market thanks to its advanced memory products.

Samsung

(Image credit: Samsung)

It's estimated that Samsung invested roughly 1.6 trillion KRW over five years to develop its 10nm DRAM technology. The core allegation is that CXMT was able to bypass much of that learning curve and, by extension, cost by calibrating its own production equipment using the stolen process “recipes,” adjusting them as needed to account for differences in toolsets and materials. This would not have eliminated the need for validation work, but it could have dramatically reduced the time and cost required to reach acceptable yields at advanced nodes.

As a result of this, CXMT has emerged as China’s most advanced DRAM producer over the past several years, beginning volume shipments of 17nm DRAM in 2022 and moving into 10nm-class production in 2023, a transition that surprised many, given the technical difficulty of scaling DRAM without access to leading-edge lithography tools. Prosecutors argue that Samsung’s trade secrets played a direct role in this rapid progression, including in CXMT’s subsequent work on HBM stacks.

While companies have invested heavily in digital access controls, monitoring, and data loss prevention systems, handwritten notes remain difficult to track or audit. Investigators say the accused engineer exploited this gap by memorizing and transcribing process flows, which is virtually impossible to police effectively.

Google Preferred Source

Follow 3DTested on Google News, or add us as a preferred source, to get our latest news, analysis, & reviews in your feeds.

TOPICS
Luke James
Contributor
  • SpicyLlama
    Need to start restricting employment in certain fields by birth country and nationality. This happens too often, both in academia and the private sector - for friends and foe of China alike. Obviously this wouldn't include Taiwan, which is a separate country and differing cultural tendencies.

    Modern day pirates.
    Reply
  • SammyB025
    Then who stole cutting edge node tech from TSMC for Intel?

    And where do you draw the line? Is knowledge learnt and memorized from working at a tech company now corporate property? Are the engineers' (and former engineers) brains themselves company property, if they worked even for a day? Is it now a crime (and not just civil contract violation, if they signed NDAs) for tech workers to ever quit and work for a rival?

    This is the reason the patent system exists, you know. If something is patented, then there is actual, legal protection. If something is kept as a "trade secret", then there is (at least theoretically) no legal protection from copying, reverse engineering, or from poached workers disclosing that information. Trade secret "theft" is only illegal if another illegal act (e.g. Breaking and entering, hacking, etc) was committed to access the trade secret in the first place. The act of disclosure itself is not the illegal part
    Reply
  • SkyBill40
    If the Chinese want it badly enough, they're going to get it regardless of the means. Corporate espionage and IP theft mean nothing to them and are all part of the engine that drives their mindset.
    Reply
  • phead128
    Samsung got its advanced nodes by hiring TSMC engineers. Intel just hired a TSMC engineers to steal talent and associates knowledge as well. It's a tale as old as time.
    Reply
  • Mfahadshah
    Well, consumers need cheap RAMs one way or another. If current suppliers can't fulfill market demands then there is no harm in anyone doing so
    Reply
  • Balter68
    Well good for Korea; when Nortel information went walkies over two decades ago Canada did nothing.
    Reply
  • jcwbnimble
    And does anyone believe China gives a darn about the copyright system? They've copied everything from Christmas tree stands to microchip lithography and never felt the pinch from a copyright infringement lawsuit. AND there is the bigger issue of intellectual property, either from the private sector or government. Anyone who doesn't think the chinese nationals working in every industry within the USA are spies for the CCP, are ignorant, stupid, or straight up spokespeople for the CCP. The CCP considers every chinese person on US soil to be spies, just like the USSR did after 1917 for every russian on US soil.
    Reply
  • phead128
    jcwbnimble said:
    And does anyone believe China gives a darn about the copyright system? They've copied everything from Christmas tree stands to microchip lithography and never felt the pinch from a copyright infringement lawsuit. AND there is the bigger issue of intellectual property, either from the private sector or government. Anyone who doesn't think the chinese nationals working in every industry within the USA are spies for the CCP, are ignorant, stupid, or straight up spokespeople for the CCP. The CCP considers every chinese person on US soil to be spies, just like the USSR did after 1917 for every russian on US soil.
    Well, US did impact tech bans on China, so I am not sure why they are crying about IP or copyright. Maybe don't impose tech bans on China then? You expect they just roll over and accept it?
    Reply
  • nameless0ne
    I wonder what type of evidence did they get? Did they find those notes scanned and sent to the competitor? Or did they simply find the notes while performing a search and then inferred that those were taken with a nefarious purpose in mind.
    Because this could have been a meticulous technician who was taking notes on technical settings he was in charge of.
    Reply
  • ribzz
    China has been stealing for a very long time. No country even comes close. They steal an idea and proliferate its manufacturing and products.
    Reply