Intel keeps socket LGA 1700 alive with new P-core-only CPUs — 'Bartlett Lake' is official, but targets embedded applications with up to 12 cores

Bartlett Lake
(Image credit: Intel)

Intel has finally introduced its long-rumored Bartlett Lake CPUs, which use a P-core-only design with up to 12 cores and are compatible with the LGA 1700 socket used on 12th- to 14th-Gen Intel chips. Contrary to speculation, however, these aren’t value-packed chips vying to earn a spot among the best CPUs for gaming. Rather, they’re commercial chips targeting embedded and edge applications.

In total, Intel is introducing 11 new SKUs, though they’re all slight variations of three different designs. There’s a 12-, 10-, and 8-core design, with slightly different clock speeds depending on the TDP. Intel is offering the chips at 125W, 65W, and 45W. At the 65W and 45W levels, there’s an additional Core 5 SKU that shaves 200MHz off the maximum boost clock and base clock of the main Core 5 offering.

The rationale for a P-core-only design is presumably the latency-sensitive applications in embedded systems and at the edge. Intel has stuck with hybrid core architectures in its consumer releases since 12th-Gen Alder Lake CPUs, but a heterogeneous architecture introduces additional complexity with scheduling tasks on the proper threads. With only performance cores, that complexity is eliminated.

Article continues below
Swipe to scroll horizontally

SKU

Cores / Threads

Frequency (Base / Boost)

All-Core Boost

Cache (L2 + L3)

Max DDR5 Frequency

Graphics

TDP

Core 9 273PQE

12 / 24

3.4 GHz / 5.9 GHz

5.3 GHz

36MB

5600 MT/s

32 EUs

125W

Core 7 253PQE

10 / 20

3.5 GHz / 5.7 GHz

5.2 GHz

33MB

5600 MT/s

32 EUs

125W

Core 5 223PQE

8 / 16

4 GHz / 5.5 GHz

5.3 GHz

24MB

5600 MT/s

32 EUs

125W

Core 9 273PE

12 / 24

2.3 GHz / 5.7 GHz

5.2 GHz

36MB

5600 MT/s

32 EUs

65W

Core 7 253PE

10 / 20

2.5 GHz / 5.5 GHz

5.1 GHz

33MB

5600 MT/s

32 EUs

65W

Core 5 223PE

8 / 16

2.9 GHz / 5.4 GHz

4.8 GHz

24MB

5600 MT/s

32 EUs

65W

Core 5 213PE

8 / 16

2.7 GHz / 5.2 GHz

4.6 GHz

24MB

5600 MT/s

24 EUs

65W

Core 9 273PTE

12 / 24

1.4 GHz / 5.5 GHz

4.6 GHz

36MB

5600 MT/s

32 EUs

45W

Core 7 253PTE

10 / 20

1.8 GHz / 5.4 GHz

4.6 GHz

33MB

5600 MT/s

32 EUs

45W

Core 5 223PTE

8 / 16

2.3 GHz / 5.4 GHz

4.8 GHz

24MB

5600 MT/s

32 EUs

45W

Core 5 213PTE

8 / 16

2.1 GHz / 5.2 GHz

4.6 GHz

24MB

5600 MT/s

24 EUs

45W

Further supporting mission-critical deployments, Bartlett Lake chips come with LTSC (Long-Term Servicing Contract) support for Windows, as well as Intel TCC (Time Coordinated Computing) and TSN (Time-Sensitive Networking) support. As with most embedded chips, the focus is on stability and consistency, hence the several variations at different TDPs and stiff all-core boost clocks.

Bartlett Lake

(Image credit: Intel)

The chips are built on Intel 7 (10nm class) and use the Raptor Cove microarchitecture that we saw with Raptor Lake consumer chips. Elsewhere, the chips are familiar. You get up to 16 PCIe 5 lanes from the CPU, plus an additional four PCIe 4 lanes. The PCH provides up to an additional 12 PCIe 4 lanes and 16 PCIe 3 lanes. There are also up to eight lanes of Intel’s Direct Media Interface 4 (DMI 4), which was first introduced with 600-series chipsets.

On the memory front, Intel officially supports up to 5,600 MT/s DDR5, and up to 192GB in capacity with ECC support.

Bartlett Lake

(Image credit: Intel)

For performance, Intel claims the Core 9 273PE — 12 cores and 65W TDP — offers up to 4.4x lower max PCIe latency, 2.5x more deterministic response time, and 3.8x better deterministic performance compared to the Ryzen 7 9700X, which is also available in an embedded version. Unfortunately, Intel has yet to publish the benchmarks it ran for these claims in its performance index, so it’s hard to put much weight behind them.

As for broader performance comparisons, Intel didn’t share any benchmarks. Once again, these are embedded chips highly focused on reliability and deterministic behavior, not peak performance.

Because Bartlett Lake isn’t heading to retail, Intel hasn’t released any pricing information, nor a strict release date. Those details are going to be subject to Intel’s individual deals with different companies. Intel tells 3DTested that there’s no plan for a consumer release in the future. If we ever see how Bartlett Lake performs in a consumer system, it’ll likely be through gray market channels.

In addition to Bartlett Lake, Intel highlighted its edge deployments for Core Ultra Series 3, previously known as Panther Lake. Compared to Nvidia’s Jetson AGX Orin 64GB for robotics, Intel claims up to 1.7x higher performance in image classification, 1.9x lower LLM latency, and 4.5x higher throughput for vision action models. Intel also claims savings in TCO (Total Cost of Ownership) compared to dual-systems in robotics, estimating up to $5,549 in savings with a single Panther Lake SoC compared to discrete accelerators like the Jetson AGX Orin and Jetson Thor.

Google Preferred Source

Follow 3DTested on Google News, or add us as a preferred source, to get our latest news, analysis, & reviews in your feeds.

TOPICS
Jake Roach
Senior Analyst, CPUs
  • ezst036
    Wait.

    Intel extended a socket past "tick" "tock"?

    That's awesome!
    Reply
  • VizzieTheViz
    ezst036 said:
    Wait.

    Intel extended a socket past "tick" "tock"?

    That's awesome!
    It’s not like you can just order these as an upgrade for your pc, but at least the platform is on life support instead of dead and buried.
    Reply
  • bit_user
    ezst036 said:
    Intel extended a socket past "tick" "tock"?

    That's awesome!
    They're using Raptor Cove cores. So, you can think of it like a variant of Raptor Lake that just replaces the 4 quad-core E clusters with 4 P-cores.

    The main issue for gamers & other home users is that most LGA 1700 boards probably won't get BIOS updates to support these CPU models, since they're being produced exclusively for the embedded computing market. So, even if you can get your hands on one of these CPUs, you'd probably have to use an industrial motherboard that would lack good support for memory OC.

    I do half-expect some boutique workstation vendors to introduce products based on them, at some point. And I'm sure gaming benchmarks on the industrial motherboards that support them will show up on Youtube, before long.

    It would've been cool if the 10-core and 12-core models supported AVX-512. But, I think we'd have heard about it by now, if that were going to happen. Intel has not enabled AVX-512 on any of the P-core Xeon E models that shipped thus far.
    Reply
  • bit_user
    VizzieTheViz said:
    at least the platform is on life support instead of dead and buried.
    Guaranteed 10-year availability means LGA1700 will be supported for another 10 years! Intel does designate some of their platforms as having long-term availability. Skylake was one of those.
    Reply
  • peterf28
    DDR4 not supported?
    Reply
  • bit_user
    peterf28 said:
    DDR4 not supported?
    Given that it's LGA1700, I'd be surprised if it didn't. But, perhaps they opted not to validate that, considering its intended market segment.

    I searched for the specs of the 273PQE on ark.intel.com, but it returned 0 hits. That's the normal way to find out what it officially supports. Probably, all of the documentation about it is available only through their partner portal, which requires a NDA to access.

    In any case, whether or not the CPUs support DDR4 doesn't matter if there aren't any DDR4 motherboards that support the CPUs. So, if someone were serious about running one, the first thing to do would be to look for motherboards which support the new CPU models.
    Reply
  • bit_user
    Here, I found one industrial board that claims support for it. I'm sure there are others, but just to give folks an idea of what sort of board they'd be looking at:
    https://jetwayipc.com/products/mi23-q670x/
    BTW, I have a Jetway Alder Lake-N board, which is why I thought to check and see if they offered support for it. That system has been running stably (24/7) for almost 2 years. But, since it was a BGA processor, the board had its own heatsink/fan, which needed to be replaced to avoid thermal-throttling. As an example of what you give up by going with an industrial board, mine implemented its M.2 slot at only x2 lanes (although the above board runs its M.2 slot at PCIe 4.0 x4) and the BIOS has no options for adjusting memory speed or timings. Idle power also runs kinda high for this CPU, but it's good enough for my purposes.
    Reply
  • thestryker
    bit_user said:
    Here, I found one industrial board that claims support for it.
    Given the BIOS date this is likely referring to the RPL rebranded BTL chips released last year. I suspect it's a likely candidate to receive 12P support though.
    Bit_user said:
    So, even if you can get your hands on one of these CPUs, you'd probably have to use an industrial motherboard that would lack good support for memory OC.
    Unfortunately I think this is probably right since I went and double checked CPU support for the W680-ACE and it doesn't include any of the "embedded" options. That tells me the likelihood of it getting BTL support is low and that the client H series chipset boards wouldn't either.
    Reply
  • VizzieTheViz
    bit_user said:
    Guaranteed 10-year availability means LGA1700 will be supported for another 10 years! Intel does designate some of their platforms as having long-term availability. Skylake was one of those.
    Fair enough but that doesn’t mean it’s much use for me as a consumer. For these embedded platforms it’s nice for sure.
    Reply
  • bit_user
    thestryker said:
    Given the BIOS date this is likely referring to the RPL rebranded BTL chips released last year.
    Look closer. The specs say:
    "Bartlett Lake-S 12P, TDP 125W under limit condition"
    Reply