China-made Loongson 12-core chip is approximately three times slower than six-core Ryzen 5 9600X — 3B6000 hampered by low clock speeds in Linux benchmarks
China's best consumer x86 CPUs are still miles behind Intel and AMD in terms of performance.
Get 3DTested's best news and in-depth reviews, straight to your inbox.
You are now subscribed
Your newsletter sign-up was successful
It's rare to find Loongson CPUs outside of China, but a Linux reviewer has managed to get one of the CPU manufacturer's 12-core chips for testing. Phoronix reviewed Loongson's 12-core 3B6000 processor in a plethora of Linux-based benchmarks. Despite its high core count, Phoronix's benchmark numbers revealed that the chip can't even approach the performance of modern Western six-core chips like the Ryzen 5 9600X.
The 3B6000 was reportedly sent over to the Linux-based outlet by the Loongson Hobbyists Community. The 3B6000 came inside a 3B6000x1-7A2000x1-EVB micro-ATX with two DIMM slots, one M.2 slot, two PCIe x16 slots, and just a handful of USB ports.
Phoronix benchmarked the 3B6000 across dozens of benchmark results, including applications with AVX-512 support. Overall, the 3B6000 was in basically last place, performing three times worse than AMD's six-core Ryzen 5 9600X. The only CPU the chip was able to overtake was the quad-core ARM CPU in the Raspberry Pi 500.
That said, the 3B6000 did not have such gloomy performance in all of the benchmarking applications Phoronix ran. For instance, in C-Ray 2.0, the 3B6000 was able to match the performance of the Ryzen 5 9600X, and in OpenSSL 3.6, it approached the performance level of the Core Ultra 5 245K. In QuickSilver 20230818, the 3B6000 managed to outperform the 245K slightly and achieve a score on par with the Core Ultra 9 285K. But these were the exceptions; in almost all other benchmark runs, the 3B6000 was significantly slower than all of AMD and Intel's x86 chips.
These performance results aren't surprising at all. The 3B6000 runs at just 2.5GHz, which is half the clock speed of most of Intel and AMD's latest chips. The Chinese chip's LA664 CPU architecture reportedly has the IPC performance of Zen 3, but the chip's abysmally slow clock speed hinders any strong IPC gains the architecture might have.
Loongson is working on newer CPU architectures that it hopes will be much faster than what the 3B6000 and its LA664 CPU architecture offer right now. Last year, we heard that the Chinese CPU maker is working on a new LA864 architecture that will reportedly to potentially have 13th/14th Gen Raptor Lake Intel CPU performance. Chips based on this architecture will also reportedly have much better clock speeds of 3 to 3.5GHz. It's still nothing close to the 5+GHz that Intel and AMD can reach, but it is a big jump for Loongson regardless.
Follow 3DTested on Google News, or add us as a preferred source, to get our latest news, analysis, & reviews in your feeds.
Get 3DTested's best news and in-depth reviews, straight to your inbox.

-
A Stoner I really detest how mathematics is used in the English language... Three times slower? How about 1/3 the speed of...Reply -
S58_is_the_goat Reply
Because... Https://medium.com/better-marketing/the-a-w-third-pounder-failed-because-people-didnt-understand-fractions-a86b966a973aA Stoner said:I really detest how mathematics is used in the English language... Three times slower? How about 1/3 the speed of... -
das_stig So all that Aaron Klotz could report was a cpu with 12HT cores is slower than its direct competitors on a unknown quality of motherboard, with unknown memory (DDR4?) And unknown anything else is slower than an modern 2 year AMD Zen 5 cpu 6HT cores.Reply
This is why TH reporters are so bad at their jobs, they report nothing of consequence and you wouldn't trust them to say the sky was blue! -
Findecanor Reply
At least they didn't write "3 <a letter> slower".A Stoner said:I really detest how mathematics is used in the English language... Three times slower? How about 1/3 the speed of... -
anoldnewb "China's best consumer x86 CPUs are still miles behind Intel and AMD in terms of performance" This is not an x86 architecture chip. It is proprietary extension of the MIPS architecture.Reply -
DS426 Reply
This is why I'm here.A Stoner said:I really detest how mathematics is used in the English language... Three times slower? How about 1/3 the speed of... -
araghur12 Reply
What in the world are you even yapping about? Use Grok or something if you have issues parsing through information.das_stig said:So all that Aaron Klotz could report was a cpu with 12HT cores is slower than its direct competitors on a unknown quality of motherboard, with unknown memory (DDR4?) And unknown anything else is slower than an modern 2 year AMD Zen 5 cpu 6HT cores.
This is why TH reporters are so bad at their jobs, they report nothing of consequence and you wouldn't trust them to say the sky was blue! -
bit_user Reply
Yeah, this core first launched in the 3A6000 almost 2 years ago. Chips & Cheese reviewed it around that time.The article said:Loongson is working on newer CPU architectures that it hopes will be much faster than what the 3B6000 and its LA664 CPU architecture offer right now.
Https://chipsandcheese.com/p/loongson-3a6000-a-star-among-chinese-cpus
Just keep in mind that it's not actually their latest & greatest. -
bit_user Reply
The Phoronix article has all the details.das_stig said:So all that Aaron Klotz could report was a cpu with 12HT cores is slower than its direct competitors on a unknown quality of motherboard, with unknown memory (DDR4?)
Https://www.phoronix.com/review/loongson-3b6000-loongarchThe CPU was BGA (i.e. Soldered to the motherboard), so there really was no choice of board. Furthermore, it seems to be a manufacturer-provided evaluation board. So, basically a reference design.
The memory was 2x 32 GB of DDR4-3200 RDIMMs. The SSD used was a Samsung 980 Pro (I doubt a faster one would've made any difference). -
bit_user Reply
Yeah, good point - the subtitle got the ISA wrong.anoldnewb said:"China's best consumer x86 CPUs are still miles behind Intel and AMD in terms of performance" This is not an x86 architecture chip. It is proprietary extension of the MIPS architecture.
As for Loongson vs. MIPS, it does have a somewhat different ISA, but the system architecture is where they borrowed most heavily from MIPS.