TeamGroup EX2 Elite 1TB SSD is Just $79 on Amazon
Get 3DTested's best news and in-depth reviews, straight to your inbox.
You are now subscribed
Your newsletter sign-up was successful
If you've been looking for a low cost, secondary storage drive for your data and games, TeamGroup's EX2 Elite SSD is a great deal. It packs 1TB of storage inside a 2.5-inch case. This SATA III internal SSD is currently available for an impressively low rate of just $.08 cents per GB, a total of $79.Â
TeamGroup EX2 Elite 1TB SSD: was $92, now $79 @Amazon
Amazon Prime members can get their hands on this deal for the price of $79 (before taxes). This SSD is up to four times faster than standard HDDs. With an SSD, you can expect faster loading times, boot times and even shut down times than a hard drive.
The EX2 Elite SSD has a read speed as high as 550 MB/s and a write speed up to 520 MB/s. TeamGroup offers the EX2 elite in both 512 GB and 1 TB sizes.
If you're looking for an ideal drive to boot your desktop from, consider pairing this with one of the NVMe drives from our list of the best SSDs. Â However, if you are upgrading a laptop that only takes SATA drives, this is a very affordable choice, Because of its size, it has a lower power consumption rate compared to traditional HDDs. This particular model measures in at 3.94" x 2.75" x 0.28".
If you want to check out this deal in detail, visit the EX2 Elite product page on Amazon. You will need to be a Prime member to receive the discount.
Get 3DTested's best news and in-depth reviews, straight to your inbox.

-
Nemesia If SATA SSD was 40 dollars per TB...why would you use a NVMe that load your OS and load your games like 1-2 seconds faster instead of just using a normal SATA SSD?Reply
You could have 3TB of SATA SSD for 120 dollars instead of paying 120 for a 1TB NVMe. If this was true I'd take the 3TB SSD any day of the week and there isn't even a down side. Loading times are almost identical. -
hotaru251 Reply
Why?nofanneeded said:Sata drives need to disappear or sell like $40 per TB...
Older systems can't use NVME.
Sata ssd are only way to get fast storage. -
Rdslw Reply
We are getting there. Price of sata was twice current 2-3 years ago. QLC & PLC are ways to lower costs while delivering enough for normal users.nofanneeded said:Sata drives need to disappear or sell like $40 per TB...
And again in 2-3 years you will see another 30-40% down.
Sata M.2 is the way to go as its cheap & small (which promotes even cheaper components).
So they will go probably ~50% down in next 2 years, and 2.5 sata will become legacy "premium" option.
Just like ddr3 is right now. -
nofanneeded Sata drives need to disappear or sell like $40 per TB...Reply
Nemesia said:If SATA SSD was 40 dollars per TB...why would you use a NVMe that load your OS and load your games like 1-2 seconds faster instead of just using a normal SATA SSD?
You could have 3TB of SATA SSD for 120 dollars instead of paying 120 for a 1TB NVMe. If this was true I'd take the 3TB SSD any day of the week and there isn't even a down side. Loading times are almost identical.
IOPS is four times the speed in NVME,and it is more fater than 2 seconds when you access thousands of tiny files.
Also, true if you want more storage it should be cheap SSD not mechanical HDD... -
nofanneeded Replyhotaru251 said:why?
Older systems can't use NVME.
Sata ssd are only way to get fast storage.
Well it has to stop at one time, do you see IDE drives around today? -
mdd1963 That's a darn good price for a 2.5" SATA in 1 TB....now if Crucial will just match it, or, come close, on their MX500 line!Reply -
USAFRet Reply
In your specific use case, show us the user facing difference between a SATA III SSD and a NVMe SSD.nofanneeded said:Sata drives need to disappear or sell like $40 per TB...
Further, the diff between 3.0 and 4.0.
Not benchmark numbers....actual user facing difference. -
nofanneeded ReplyUSAFRet said:In your specific use case, show us the user facing difference between a SATA III SSD and a NVMe SSD.
Further, the diff between 3.0 and 4.0.
Not benchmark numbers....actual user facing difference.
1- Backuping, Higher IOPS helps alot in total time to backup your data... Reading tens of thousands tiny files.. Here NVME is four times faster...
2- Making image files or also alot faster...
3- indexing and file search, and search within files.. Like four times faster as well
4- Showing icons of files in folders, alot faster if there are hundreds of files.
5- Booting systems does not feel much faster...
6- Updating systems feels alot faster when you calculate restarting many times and installing updates.
7- Games loading.. Well depends on the game.. But not more than 4 seconds per level.
But between PCIE 3.0 and 4.0 there is not much difference because the random reading and writing files will never saturate PCIe 3.0 anyways.... -
NightHawkRMX Gonna be honest, going from a $25 dramless SATA SSD to a nice $120 NVME I notice very little if any difference in day to day tasks. I timed it once and boot times were maybe 2-3 seconds faster, not something noticeable unless timing it.Reply
I couldn't find a reason that you would need a SATA drive to be that cheap in order to justify it.
