Kioxia Unveils 2nd Gen XL-Flash Storage Class Memory for Ultra-High-End SSDs

Kioxia has introduced its 2nd Generation XL-Flash storage class memory (SCM), which combines low latency, high performance, and capacity of 3D NAND flash. The new memory devices are designed for ultra-high-end solid-state drives as well as various CXL memory extender devices that have to offer both decent performance and non-volatility.

Kioxia's 2nd Gen XL-Flash substantially differs substantially from existing XL-Flash devices. First up, the new XL-Flash adopts multi-level cell (MLC) architecture that stores two bits per cell (2bpc) as opposed to existing XL-Flash that uses single-level cell (SLC) architecture. Usage of MLC enabled Kioxia to increase capacity of a single 2nd Gen XL-Flash device to 256GB (32GB), which enables it to build XL-Flash chip packages of up to 2048Gb (256GB) using up to eight ICs. 

Article continues below

Kioxia

(Image credit: Kioxia)

Kioxia promises that its 2nd Generation XL-Flash storage class memory will provide higher performance than its 1st Gen XL-Flash SCM at lower per-bit cost. Furthermore, it will allow for building of higher-capacity drives. For now it does not look like Kioxia plans to wind down production of SLC XL-Flash, so those who need such memory will be able to buy it. Meanwhile, 2nd Gen XL-Flash is aimed primarily at CXL-enabled SSDs and memory expanders, so they promise to have an edge over existing PCIe/NVMe drives in applications that require low latencies. 

Kioxia says that it will begin shipments of 2nd Gen XL-Flash samples this November with volume production set to kick off in 2023.

Anton Shilov
Contributing Writer
  • 2Be_or_Not2Be
    Low-latency benefit, huh? I wish Kioxia, Samsung, or SK Hynix (well, they bought Intel's NAND flash biz) had bought Optane storage from Intel & kept on developing it. Low-latency was never a problem with Optane/3DXpoint.
    Reply
  • bit_user
    2Be_or_Not2Be said:
    I wish Kioxia, Samsung, or SK Hynix (well, they bought Intel's NAND flash biz) had bought Optane storage from Intel & kept on developing it. Low-latency was never a problem with Optane/3DXpoint.
    I say this as a fan of Optane and someone who wanted (still wants) an Optane SSD for my PC: I think what killed Optane is that they simply could not come anywhere close to competing on price.

    And I don't know enough about the underlying technology, but it's entirely possible that Optane simply doesn't scale down well. I expect that if the technology truly had legs, then someone would've picked up the assets if Intel were simply unwilling or unable to continue investing in it.
    Reply