California bill would restrict 3D printer sales to state-approved models to prevent printing gun parts — joins Washington and NY on legal offensive
Modifying firmware or using open-source software would probably become illegal
Get 3DTested's best news and in-depth reviews, straight to your inbox.
You are now subscribed
Your newsletter sign-up was successful
A new bill proposed in the California State Assembly could potentially require the makers of 3D printers to confirm that they are using algorithms or other technologies to prevent the printing of firearms.
The new bill is AB-2047, and it mostly mimics Washington's HB 2321 and New York Assembly's S9005/A10005, all proposed recently in 2026. However, California goes one step further by "[banning] the sale or transfer of any 3D printer in California unless it appears on a state-maintained roster of approved makes and models."
If the bill is passed as is, then by July 2027, the California Department of Justice would be required to publish guidance on certifying 3D printers and their software controls to block the printing of gun parts. The department would accept applications for approval before January 2028, and six months later in July 2028, every company intent on making or selling a 3D printer in California would need to attest that they have met those stanards. That September, the stated would publish a list of authorized makes and models to be updated quarterly.
Unauthorized printers would be banned from sale beginning on March 1, 2029.
As with the Washington and New York bills, circumvention of these measures would be made illegal. The California bill specifically states the following:
(A) For firmware design, guidance for how vendors are required to demonstrate that their technology will ensure a printer directs potential print jobs to the algorithm before printing can occur.
(B) For integrated preprint software design, guidance for how vendors shall demonstrate that printers will accept print jobs exclusively from a single preprint software and will not accept print jobs from any other preprint software, including from a user seeking to evade a detection algorithm.
Washington's bill, meanwhile, states the measures "cannot be overridden or otherwise defeated by a user with significant technical skill." This could ultimately mean every printer in the state would have a locked bootloader, firmware, and/or slicer.
Adafruit, which sells tools and supplies to makers, points out on its blog that the combination of the three states represents a significant slice of the 3D printing market, for a combined 20% of the U.S.' Population, and 24% of the nation's GDP. If all three bills pass, 3D printing vendors could balk at making and maintaining separate product lines for California, Washing, New York state, and the rest of the country.
Get 3DTested's best news and in-depth reviews, straight to your inbox.
Follow 3DTested on Google News, or add us as a preferred source, to get our latest news, analysis, & reviews in your feeds.

-
Air2004 Why do some politicians think they can legislate way any and all problems?Reply
Maybe, if they just enforce the laws currently on the books instead of creating new ones that mimic law/s already in place, something might actually get down. -
bill001g Politicians seem to be the people with the lowest IQ on the planet. They try to make laws with no understanding. In the best cases they hire experts to advise them.Reply
3d printed guns are mostly a myth. If you could really make guns out of 100% plastic this would have started well before 3d printers. The major gun manufactures would have factories producing them using injection molding for far less than 3d printing.
Sure you can fire 1 or 2 bullets from a plastic gun if you are lucky. It might also kill the person who is shooting it.
Your local hardware store sell lots of things that you can put bullets into and fire 1 or 2 times.
The only things I have seen you can print with 3d printers that is a actual risk are the devices that allow you to make them fully automatic.
It is same people who cower under their bed when they see a photo of a gun that let the people misusing guns out of jail over and over. A guy robs a store with a gun gets probation. A while later he get caught carrying a gun which since he is a felon convicted of a gun crime should put him in jail for 5yrs minimum and he is lucky if he gets any jail time, likely more probation. -
gljames24 I completely dislike guns, but bills like this are completely idiotic. It would be the same as preventing people from owning plant growing equipment unless it had a weed sensor that talked back to an agency. Really, if someone is making and selling ghost guns, there are much better methods of prevention.Reply
I wonder if this has less to do with guns and more to do with 3D printer manufacturers trying to gatekeep their market.